Lia Koltyrina / Shutterstock.com
When does parody infringe and are all parodies expressive works? Anne Gilson LaLonde examines whether tests such as 'Rogers' are fit for purpose.
A lookalike for Barney the purple dinosaur—the wholesome, unnaturally cheerful character from children’s TV—was tackled, flipped, and assaulted by a sports mascot performing at an event.
The US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found that this was an obvious parody, mocking Barney’s relentless optimism, and held that consumer confusion was unlikely.
In trademark cases, US courts struggle to balance the right to free speech with the likelihood that consumers will be confused. If an alleged infringer’s work is a parody—poking fun at the trademark rather than simply freeriding off its renown—consumers will be less likely to believe the work is created by the trademark owner.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at firstname.lastname@example.org
Rogers, expressive works, parody, trademarks