Jellycat’s ‘dupe’ dilemma: Can IP protect a ‘cute’ aesthetic?
Jellycat’s battle against ‘dupes’ is testing the limits of intellectual property protection for design-led brands, from trademark and passing-off claims to copyright and design rights. As the plush-toy company takes on retailers including Aldi, Next, Hamleys and Morrisons, lawyers examine how far brands can go in protecting a distinctive look and feel.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com
19 June 2026 In one of the first major US dupe cases to reach trial, a jury favoured the defendant, exposing the limits of anti-copycat IP claims. WIPR explores how to avoid following in the footsteps of a pivotal test case.
8 May 2026 Dupe culture is no longer on the fringes. FIFA’s senior counsel joins Alo’s in-house counsel and other brand protection experts to explore how rights owners can tackle the trend.
5 May 2026 Tom Phillips sits down with Roland Mallinson, head of brands at Taylor Wessing at INTA 2026 in London, on the eve of the firm's merger with Winston & Strawn.
2 October 2026 Counsel for the tech startup hits back at the patent office’s “archaic thinking”, after the hearing officer insists his reasoning is aligned with the Supreme Court’s landmark artificial neural network decision.