Louis Vuitton loses ‘Frankenstein products’ battle
A ruling by South Korea’s Supreme Court finds that repurposing luxury goods for personal use doesn’t infringe trademarks, in a decision expected to draw global scrutiny.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
17 November 2025 From counterfeits to AI, Leo Longauer of LVMH and Marques explains why in-house lawyers need clarity, simplicity, and decisiveness more than ever.
19 September 2025 Luxury brands face threats from superfakes, resale platforms, and upcycled goods but as LVMH’s Leo Longauer explains, recent court triumphs signal a tougher stance on enforcement. Muireann Bolger reports.
8 October 2024 Dispute centres on the fashion house’s distinctive monogram, which originated more than a century ago | EUIPO found ‘mental link’ between signs despite the absence of verbal and aural similarities.
23 February 2026 A sharp rise in UK trademark filings suggests a boom year for brand protection but the details behind the numbers tell a more complicated story.