Judge slices $1.75m off Impossible Foods' damages, citing jury prejudice

The meat-substitution company convinced a California judge to slash punitive damages awarded to sports and nutrition brand Impossible X—owned by influencer Joel Runyon—after finding ‘prejudicial effect on the jury’, but both parties now face a new trial in their trademark battle.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com

More on this story

Trademarks

How we won $3m+ for an influencer against Impossible Foods

31 March 2026 A solo entrepreneur has beaten a billion-dollar brand in a trademark trial. BraunHagey & Borden’s counsel reveals the strategies that secured a decisive victory.

Patents

‘Bleeding’ plant burger company dines out on EU patent win

8 January 2025 Plant-based meat substitute company secures patent for “meat” technology after a European court ruling | Patent covers flavour and aroma of its meat substitutes | Potentially significant win by market leader after demand falters.

No ‘piggy-backing’: Hasbro wins sweeping order in Peppa case

Bottega Veneta vs Meta: ‘Made in Italy’ row tests limits of online enforcement

Fish & Richardson adds AI and electronics specialist

Quantum computing’s picks-and-shovels moment: What the new US executive orders signal for IP

FisherBroyles and Hong Kong affiliate draft in senior partners

‘Engagement and collaboration’: New IP Federation president builds on strong foundations

AliExpress hit with €550m fine over failure to tackle illegal products

Attorneys’ fees slashed as judge signs off landmark $1.5bn Anthropic deal

Judge slices $1.75m off Impossible Foods' damages, citing jury prejudice

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles