orhan-cam-shutterstock-com-us-supreme-court-

24 February 2016Patents

SCOTUS hearing: Halo and Stryker cases create ‘trolls v pirates’ debate

A US Supreme Court case that centres on enhanced damages in patent infringement cases may create a new characterisation of “trolls versus pirates”.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

Stryker v Zimmer: Federal Circuit rules that infringement was wilful

14 September 2016 The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has affirmed an earlier district court ruling of wilful infringement but has remanded the award of triple damages in the latest patent case between medical devices companies Stryker and Zimmer.

Patents

Halo and Stryker cases: SCOTUS relaxes standard for enhanced patent damages

13 June 2016 The US Supreme Court has today decided to relax the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s test for awarding enhanced damages in patent cases.

Patents

WIPR survey: Readers call on SCOTUS to reverse Halo and Stryker rulings

6 March 2016 WIPR readers have said the US Supreme Court should overturn lower court rulings in two patent infringement cases that centre on enhanced damages.

Gaming platform owner wins ‘patent troll’ case against prolific inventor

Kilpatrick grows trademark offering in Chicago with Perkins Coie duo

Mintz gains ex-Winston & Strawn partner and ITC expert

Ex-Palantir staff can work at new rival but must not 'poach' more

Danaher moves to acquire Masimo in $9.9bn deal

Which? abandons $652m Qualcomm class action

Emotional Perception exclusive: ‘We are now very much open for business’

Fed Circ hands Netflix a win in streaming patent dispute

SCOTUS hearing: Halo and Stryker cases create ‘trolls v pirates’ debate

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles