29 September 2014PatentsThomas Lederer

Computer implemented inventions: recent changes in case law

“Change is the essential process of all existence,” Commander Spock said in one of the last episodes of the original Star Trek series. Since the US Supreme Court published its long-awaited opinion on Alice v CLS Bank, many commentators have tried to use Alice in Wonderland references to describe the situation, but Commander Spock hit the mark.

The current situation of computer-implemented inventions in the US is far from clear. While David Kappos, former director of the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), considers protection for software innovation to be intact, several others are of the opinion that gaining protection for computer-implemented inventions has now become harder, if not impossible. However applicants for a US patent in that field might at least hope to be spared different interpretations of the issue by the examiners, as the USPTO reacted quickly to Alice and issued Preliminary Examining Instructions.

Accordingly, examiners will look at all claims using a two-part analysis familiar from the Mayo v Prometheus case, ie, by determining:

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at

More on this story

16 October 2019   The CJEU's Advocate General has handed down an opinion in one of this year’s most interesting trademark cases. The effects may strike at the heart of the trademark registration system, argues Tristan Sherliker of Bird & Bird.
24 March 2021   The UK government will consult on the possibility of introducing legal changes for protecting AI-generated inventions which do not meet inventorship criteria, it confirmed following a call for views on AI and IP.