shutterstock_1777476575_xanderst
21 June 2021CopyrightMuireann Bolger

Triller hits YouTube channel operator with copyright suit

Video-sharing social networking service Triller has accused the operator of the YourEXTRA YouTube channel of copyright infringement over the uploading and distribution of a boxing game.

The complaint was filed at the US District Court for the Central District of California on June 16 and was first reported by TorrentFreak.

Triller is the copyright owner and publisher of the “ Triller Fight Club” broadcast of the Jake Paul versus Ben Askren boxing event.

According to the filing, Triller’s copyright in the broadcast became effective on April 30, 2021, and was decided on May 4, 2021.

It holds that Arvin De La Santos, the operator of the YouTube channel YourEXTRA, unlawfully uploaded, distributed and publicly displayed, without authorisation, the broadcast to the users of the channel.

Channel founded as ‘alter ego’

The channel has more than 113,000 subscribers and since its founding in 2017 has racked up more than 14 million views. According to Triller, the channel is an alter ego of Santos and “was conceived, intended, and used by Santos as a device to avoid liability” for infringement.

After becoming aware of the alleged infringement, Triller notified YouTube which removed the content. Triller insists that in order to buy and view the broadcast through a satellite TV provider intended for private, non-commercial viewing, an individual buyer was subject to the copyright language which expressly stated that the “unauthorised reproduction or distribution of the copyrighted work is illegal”.

Triller’s anti-piracy campaign

The filing claims that the operator obtained the broadcast through internet websites, cable and/or satellite pay-per-view purchase intended for private, noncommercial viewing, and subsequently illegally re-transmitted the broadcast and publicly exhibited the broadcast by illegally copying and uploading the broadcast to the YouTube Channel.

The move follows the filing of a spate of complaints by Triller against companies and people who it claims copied, streamed, or otherwise distributed the fight without permission, including channels such as the H3 Podcast.

Triller has requested damages for copyright infringement, and the operator’s alleged violation of the Federal Communications Act.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox

Today’s top stories

Duane Morris adds ex-USPTO judge to its IP practice

Live-chat messenger firm receives $30m from trade secrets suit

Russian bill proposes mandatory removal of infringing search engine results

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Trademarks
4 July 2023   Brands that use influencers must take greater diligence to avoid reputational damage, says Rute Franco of Inventa.
Copyright
31 August 2022   Label accuses Tik-Tok rival of owing millions of dollars in licensing fees | Triller argues that the lawsuit “grossly mischaracterised” contractual relationship.
Trademarks
6 January 2023   The World Boxing Council accused the International Boxing Association of awarding belt similar to its own at UAE event | Extensive use of the belt provides WBC with trade dress protections, claims the pro boxing body.