• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • INTA 2024
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • ‘We were on tenterhooks’: Winning counsel dives into WaterRower
18 November 2024NewsCopyrightMuireann Bolger

‘We were on tenterhooks’: Winning counsel dives into WaterRower

Following the High Court’s long-awaited WaterRower decision, WIPR met with Rachel Pearse of Gunnercooke, part of the winning team, to explore what the “fascinating” case means for designers.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Future of IP
Rowing machine ruling sends ripples across UK design sector
11 November 2024   Key test case examined the copyright protection of 3D-functional designs | Designers left with “unsatisfactory decision” and “uncertain state”, say watchers | English law at odds with EU case law on “artistic works”.


Editor's picks

Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025   Recent decision by acting USPTO director Coke Morgan Stewart has “damaging” consequences, argues Vidal | Stewart kickstarts campaign of implied criticism of predecessor’s record.
AI
UK delays AI bill at pivotal moment as High Court hears Getty case
9 June 2025
Artificial Intelligence
Getty v Stability AI: High stakes at the High Court
6 June 2025
Trademarks
AI, lipstick deals and mental health: What’s on CITMA president’s radar?
9 May 2025
Patents
Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history
2 May 2025
Patents
US-China tariffs: What hope is there for IP rightsholders?
1 May 2025

More articles

‘Cynical and bewildering’: UK omits copyright protections in Data Bill
Getty v Stability AI trial stalls over disturbing images issue
UPC promises CMS overhaul with new phased release
‘Any copying was done by Getty lawyers’: Stability AI hits back
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
BSH v Electrolux: A US perspective on cross-border patent enforcement
Getty slams Stability’s ‘distorted AI rubbish’ in opening arguments
UK delays AI bill at pivotal moment as High Court hears Getty case

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

Copyright © worldipreview.com 2024   |   Headless Content Management with Blaze