• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Mediation for IP cases
1 February 2011CopyrightMa. Consuelo C. Agno

Mediation for IP cases

The Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004 declared that it is “the policy of the State to actively promote party autonomy in the resolution of disputes or the freedom of the parties to make their own arrangements to resolve their disputes.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

article
Virtual mediation: here to stay
9 July 2021   As face-to-face meetings slowly start to return, one method of online alternative dispute resolution has proven its lastability, says David Friedland of Friedland Vining.
Copyright
The Right Remedy: Why Mediation is Becoming a Better Option
18 November 2020   It is expensive, time-consuming, and too adversarial—these are some of the complaints leveled against the court system when dealing with IP disputes. But are alternative procedures the answer? Sarah Morgan investigates.


Editor's picks

World IP Review launches Global In-House Elite 2026
In-House
World IP Review launches Global In-House Elite 2026
27 March 2026

Editor's picks

In-House
World IP Review launches Global In-House Elite 2026
27 March 2026
AI
UK kicks the AI copyright can down the road: 5 takeaways for business
20 March 2026
AI
UK makes U-turn as government drops AI copyright exception
18 March 2026
Trademarks
Who owns a name? Katy Perry, Estée Lauder and Jo Malone test rights
16 March 2026
Trade secrets
How we won: The irony of a trade secrets courtroom exposé
16 March 2026
Trademarks
INTA: ‘New normal’ for in-house counsel as budgets fall
13 March 2026

More articles

World IP Review launches Global In-House Elite 2026
How a hair curling patent dispute reached Europe’s highest court
Cox v Sony: SCOTUS trims ISP liability in ‘seismic decision’
Report: Top 50 organisations producing high-impact AI inventions
EPO filings hit record high as AI and quantum drive renewed growth
King & Spalding adds another Winston & Strawn litigation partner
EU zeroes in on China’s e-commerce giants as AliExpress faces grilling
Nike scores $11m ‘dupe’ win against social media influencer

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin