25 September 2025NewsTrade secretsCarolyn Hoecker Luedtke

Lessons for trade secret counsel as Comet v XP Power heats up

A recent oral hearing in the technology firms’ trade secret dispute raised some interesting questions about jury instruction errors, ‘double recovery’ and attorneys’ fees, notes Carolyn Hoecker of Luedtke of Munger, Tolles & Olson.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trade secrets

Trade secrets go global: How brand owners face a high-stakes battlefront

15 September 2025 How can companies stay ahead in trade secret protection, from adapting to new legislation and emerging case law to managing cross-border risks? Marisa Woutersen reports from the AIPPI World Congress 2025.

Trade secrets

Four firms reach highest tier in WIPR’s 2025 Global Trade Secrets Rankings

18 August 2025 Results are out for this year’s one-of-a-kind rankings, detailing the year’s most significant trade secrets matters around the world and which attorneys handled them.

All eyes on Squires: What IP experts want from the new USPTO director

AI levels up the gaming industry, but can IP keep up?

Behind the scenes: The copyright pitfall facing an Emmy winner

Balancing access and trade secrets in automated credit-scoring

Ropes & Gray loses 21-attorney group to join rival on growth spree

Hollywood studios join forces to sue Chinese AI startup’s content generator

For F***’s sake: Why everyone needs clarity over F-word trademark refusal

Lessons for trade secret counsel as Comet v XP Power heats up

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles