Subscribe
Ryan Abbott, solicitor advocate who represents Stephen Thaler
21 July 2025FeaturesPatentsRyan Abbott

Thaler 2: AI-generated inventions return to the UK High Court

Stephen Thaler’s next DABUS hearing at the UK High Court puts the inventorship test on trial. Thaler's counsel Ryan Abbott brings us up to date on the issues at the heart of this seminal case.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

AI
Inventors on patents must be human, Japan court tells DABUS owner
3 February 2025   Japan IP High Court follows decisions in UK, US and Europe that machines cannot be recognised as inventors on patents.
Future of IP
‘A country will soon accept AI inventor patents’ says DABUS patent attorney
22 March 2024   Panellists from Qualcomm and Clarivate discuss AI trends in key Future of IP webinar | The West would be “scrambling to change laws” should China push ahead with AI inventorship | Scepticism could lead to “insurmountable barriers” to protection, says Qualcomm chief IP counsel.
Patents
UK Supreme Court hears DABUS appeal
2 March 2023   Stephen Thaler’s legal campaign returns to the limelight following rejection by several other jurisdictions | AI machine ‘DABUS’ tests invention theory under established patent law | Five Justices hear arguments on the ‘Absence of traditional human inventor’.


Editor's picks

Starjacking and reverse engineering: How AI is changing IP crime
Artificial Intelligence
Starjacking and reverse engineering: How AI is changing IP crime
18 July 2025

Editor's picks

Artificial Intelligence
Starjacking and reverse engineering: How AI is changing IP crime
18 July 2025   Bad actors use AI to artificially inflate GitHub repository credibility, says CITMA report | AI-generated counterfeits combine reverse engineering with 3D printing to produce ‘indistinguishable’ replicas | Professional benefits include increased efficiencies but accuracy and consistency remain patchy.
Patents
‘Written submissions cannot be underestimated’: How G1/23 changed European prior art rules
18 July 2025
Trademarks
Iceland Foods TM frozen out of EU by Nordic country
16 July 2025
Patents
UK launches SEPs consultation in bid to tackle inefficiency
15 July 2025
Patents
Netlist’s IP head: External counsel ‘should understand our business goals’
11 July 2025
Trademarks
Rubik's Cube loses pivotal EU 'shape' case
9 July 2025

More articles

‘Measured and constructive’: The UKIPO’s post-SkyKick guidance
WATCH: Protecting life science innovations involving big data, AI and machine learning
Starjacking and reverse engineering: How AI is changing IP crime
Pressure mounts for Anthropic as judge allows authors to include pirated datasets in claims
‘Written submissions cannot be underestimated’: How G1/23 changed European prior art rules
US firm Brownstein nabs five from Crowell ‘at pivotal moment’
Iceland Foods TM frozen out of EU by Nordic country
Three reasons why the UK’s SEPs plans ‘misunderstand' licensing reality

Copyright © worldipreview.com 2024   |   Headless Content Management with Blaze