Lululemon beats Nike after judge kicks out $355k Flyknit verdict
A US judge has sided with the Canadian ‘athleisure’ brand in its running-shoe feud, overturning a jury verdict from a year ago by finding Nike’s patent obvious.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
8 August 2025 Nike fails to uphold key patent covering Flyknit shoe manufacturing methods | PTAB invalidates all claims after prior art challenge by Lululemon.
25 April 2025 As the Canadian athleisure brand competes with Nike over running shoe patents, Lululemon's external counsel explains how a jury verdict gives his client the lead.
11 March 2025 Canadian ‘athleisure’ brand did not infringe a patent belonging to Nike | Jury conceded $355K in damages to Nike for expired patent | PTAB due to issue final written decisions on inter partes review of all three patents at issue in the coming months.
7 April 2026 In light of Emotional Perception AI, the UKIPO has rewritten the rules for “mixed inventions". Matt Jefferies and Eric McNeil of Marks & Clerk explore what this pivot means for applicants protecting their AI technology.