WIPR readers split over Andrei Iancu nomination as USPTO director

WIPR readers are split over Donald Trump’s decision to nominate Andrei Iancu as director of the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to replace Michelle Lee.

In an exact 50/50 split, some of those against the nomination claimed he was not sufficiently qualified.

One reader stated that Iancu’s experience as a litigation lawyer will not be a great fit for the role.

The reader stated that somebody with some firsthand professional experience of the USPTO, “particularly during examination, would have been much better” as USPTO examination is “terrible and is the root of all the problems with the US patent system”.

Another stated that they won’t be supporting the candidate as they felt he is not as capable as his predecessor Lee, “who has no second copy in her expertise at the USPTO”.

Of the respondents who agreed with the nomination, many pointed to Iancu’s “extensive experience” in the field as a reason for agreeing with the nomination.

One stated that Iancu has “excellent judgment and is an effective leader” and that his “vast IP experience” makes him a good fit, while another stated that “it’s time for a change”.

Another WIPR reader said Iancu has a “deep understanding and appreciation of the need for a strong and fair patent system”.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox