shutterstock_1477317968_dani_ber
6 January 2022PatentsAlex Baldwin

Nike sues Lululemon over ‘Mirror Gym’ tech patents

Nike has accused competitor Lululemon Athletica of infringing six fitness tech patents by making and selling an at-home “Mirror Gym” and an accompanying mobile app.

The Oregon-based sportswear giant filed a complaint alleging patent infringement at the US District Court for the Southern District of New York yesterday, January 5.

According to Nike, Lululemon’s Mirror Home Gym system has several features, including a digital heart rate monitor, exercise alerts, and a method of collecting and presenting athletic activity data that infringe its patents.

The six patents in suit are Nike’s US numbers 8,620,413; 9,278,256; 9,259,615; 10,188,930; 10,232,220; and 10,923,225.

Nike is seeking a judgment that Lululemon has directly infringed its patents, an injunction barring Lululemon from selling any infringing products, and an order for Lululemon to pay triple damages.

Lululemon, which primarily sells sportswear, acquired home fitness start-up Mirror for $500 million in 2020, according to the New York Times.

It completed the acquisition in July 2020 and started selling the Mirror Home Gym in stores in select US stores in November that year.

A letter addressed to Nike from Morrison & Foerster attorney Diek Van Nort on behalf of Lululemon denies the allegations that the “Mirror” or the accompanying app infringe the six Nike patents.

It details how the collection of exercise data, exercise alerts and the transmission of information between the “Mirror” and the app differs from the methods detailed in Nike’s patents.

In a statement made to Reuters, a Lululemon spokesperson said: “The patents in question are overly broad and invalid. We are confident in our position and look forward to defending it in court.”

Last month, Nike filed a complaint with the US International Trade Commission asking the agency to block Adidas from importing its “Primeknit” sneakers into the US.

Nike sought an immediate investigation as to whether the sale of Primeknit shoes infringe its knitted footwear asserted patents as well as a permanent exclusion order and cease and desist orders.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox

Today’s top stories

Tarantino pursues Pulp Fiction NFT sales despite Miramax suit

Markle secures ‘odd’ confidential sum over copyright infringement win

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
2 February 2022   Fuelled by the almost overnight transition to working from home triggered by the Covid-19 pandemic, the global home fitness equipment market was estimated to be worth $8.4 billion in 2020.
Patents
30 November 2021   Peloton Interactive is facing a counter suit from Lululemon Athletica after it sued the apparel maker over claims that it infringed design patents and trade dress.
Patents
18 May 2022   Fitness equipment rivals Peloton and iFIT have settled a patent infringement suit six months after Peloton brought the complaint against its rival.