rost9
7 July 2020Patents

Engine valve suit should be heard in Canada, rules Indiana judge

An Indiana federal court has granted an Alberta engine maker’s motion to dismiss a patent infringement suit, on the grounds that the case should be heard in Canada.

In an opinion issued last week, the US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana dismissed  Tyler Research Corporation’s patent infringement suit against  Envacon.

The court invoked the legal doctrine of forum non conveniens, which allows a federal district court to dismiss a suit over which it would normally have jurisdiction in order to best serve the convenience of the parties.

Tyler Research, also based in Alberta, sued Envacon for patent infringement in February. According to Tyler Research, Envacon attempted to deprive it of its exclusive manufacturing rights under a licensing deal between the two Canadian-based firms.

The patent at the heart of the licensing agreement covers the design of shut off valves, used in engines.

Envacon argued that the lawsuit should be dismissed in Indiana and continued at a Canadian court instead.

Tyler Research put forward several arguments against Envacon’s motion to dismiss, including that the company waived its right to invoke forum non conveniens by not raising it in earlier filings.

But the court disagreed, citing precedent that there is “generally ... no time limit on when a motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens must be made”.

Tyler Research also argued that a Canadian court was unlikely to adjudicate infringement claims based on a US patent.

But the court responded: “The court agrees with the plaintiff’s contention; it is true that a Canadian court is unlikely to adjudicate a claim for the infringement of a US patent. However, the plaintiff could still bring a claim for the infringement of the shut off valve’s Canadian patent in a Canadian court.”

“Furthermore, a Canadian court would certainly adjudicate the plaintiff’s breach of contract claim, which alone would remedy the alleged wrong,” the judgment read.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
25 November 2019   A US-based maker of hybrid engine technology and a Baltimore-based charity have accused BMW of infringing patents.
Patents
11 July 2019   The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled that General Electric does not have standing to challenge a turbine engine patent owned by United Technologies Corporation.