18 August 2023FeaturesCopyrightMatt Savare and Bryan Sterba

How to handle the ‘wild west’ of generative AI: part 2

Courts have yet to articulate how copyright authorship standards should adapt to partially generated artificial intelligence (GAI) works. Yet, that has not stopped technologists from testing the legal boundaries.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

How to handle the ‘wild west’ of generative AI: part I

17 August 2023 Recent court cases are beginning to hint at how copyright issues concerning the training of generative AI algorithms will be handled—but firmer guidance is needed to reassure artists, say Matt Savare, Bryan Sterba and Chloe Rippe of Lowenstein Sandler, in part I of a two-part series.

Adobe offers ‘IP safe’ generative AI tool to businesses

12 June 2023 Firefly is a ‘commercially and legally safe’ tool that automatically attaches credentials tag that flags AI use | Software firm promises to protect customers from infringement claims.

On the table: Furniture case set to clarify copyright and design protection in Europe

Squire Patton Boggs adds patent litigation partner

Walk the mime: Johnny Cash estate says Coca-Cola 'stole' voice

Boeing fights trade secret claims with motion to refuse document claw-back

FisherBroyles boosts litigation capabilities with veteran trial lawyer

Squires affirms USPTO’s stance on AI with revised guidance

Misuse of genAI to draft patents ‘a big concern’: CIPA’s AI chair

EasyGroup fails to prove public would be confused by 'Easihire'

How to handle the ‘wild west’ of generative AI: part 2

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles