18 August 2023FeaturesCopyrightMatt Savare and Bryan Sterba

How to handle the ‘wild west’ of generative AI: part 2

Courts have yet to articulate how copyright authorship standards should adapt to partially generated artificial intelligence (GAI) works. Yet, that has not stopped technologists from testing the legal boundaries.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com

More on this story

How to handle the ‘wild west’ of generative AI: part I

17 August 2023 Recent court cases are beginning to hint at how copyright issues concerning the training of generative AI algorithms will be handled—but firmer guidance is needed to reassure artists, say Matt Savare, Bryan Sterba and Chloe Rippe of Lowenstein Sandler, in part I of a two-part series.

Adobe offers ‘IP safe’ generative AI tool to businesses

12 June 2023 Firefly is a ‘commercially and legally safe’ tool that automatically attaches credentials tag that flags AI use | Software firm promises to protect customers from infringement claims.

Getty tests limits of law in pivotal AI hearing at UK Court of Appeal

ByteDance dismisses NPE’s patent claims over reciprocal hyperlinks

‘Big Five’ win $19.5m against shadow library WeLib

How a press publisher's case against Google could alter genAI liability

Netlist opens new legal offensive with ITC and federal court complaints

Lambretta trademark battle lands at UK High Court with mod-era flair

Victoria’s Secret cleared to sue Thomas Pink in US

CEO of US law firm Fishman Stewart elected to AIPLA board of directors

How to handle the ‘wild west’ of generative AI: part 2

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles