Counsel Q&A: Why Richard Prince judgments are ‘very pro-art’

Two photographers took on a highly successful attribution artist and won before their cases got to trial. Lead counsel for the plaintiffs, David Marriott at Cravath, tells Sarah Speight why the legal action “wasn’t really about money”.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

Google sued over photo features in Pixel products

23 June 2023 Complaint filed by IP management firm alleges patent infringement over digital imaging technology | Google Pixel smartphones, Pixel Tablets and the Snapseed app are all listed in suit as alleged infringing devices.

Capcom settles ‘Resident Evil’ dispute with photographer

9 February 2022 A copyright infringement lawsuit over in-game art assets used in several games published by Capcom, including the “Resident Evil” series, has been dismissed, according to documents filed with the Connecticut district court.

Tata customers Apple and Tesla reportedly held to ransom after hack

UK court sets Warner and Paramount interim licence rate payable to Nokia

Coach drops Quince dupe lawsuit after Ugg verdict

SpaceX launches into public orbit, but what now for its secretive IP strategy?

Cahill drafts in ex-King & Spalding tech litigation partner

World Cup fakes spark global crackdown

Ugg owner v Quince: 5 takeaways for brands battling dupes

Bigger verdicts, fewer injunctions: AI, telecoms, and trade secrets shake up litigation

Counsel Q&A: Why Richard Prince judgments are ‘very pro-art’

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles