Counsel Q&A: Why Richard Prince judgments are ‘very pro-art’

Two photographers took on a highly successful attribution artist and won before their cases got to trial. Lead counsel for the plaintiffs, David Marriott at Cravath, tells Sarah Speight why the legal action “wasn’t really about money”.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

Google sued over photo features in Pixel products

23 June 2023 Complaint filed by IP management firm alleges patent infringement over digital imaging technology | Google Pixel smartphones, Pixel Tablets and the Snapseed app are all listed in suit as alleged infringing devices.

Capcom settles ‘Resident Evil’ dispute with photographer

9 February 2022 A copyright infringement lawsuit over in-game art assets used in several games published by Capcom, including the “Resident Evil” series, has been dismissed, according to documents filed with the Connecticut district court.

A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion

What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?

Vidal: Settled expectations factor is ‘unconstitutional overreach’

‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out

Stamped out: What was in the US Copyright Office AI report?

Third Circ grants first ‘fair use’ AI and copyright appeal in Thomson v ROSS

Getty bid to broaden claim shut down by Court of Appeal

How to cook a frog: The erosion of exclusive copyright in the EU

Counsel Q&A: Why Richard Prince judgments are ‘very pro-art’

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles