Counsel Q&A: Why Richard Prince judgments are ‘very pro-art’

Two photographers took on a highly successful attribution artist and won before their cases got to trial. Lead counsel for the plaintiffs, David Marriott at Cravath, tells Sarah Speight why the legal action “wasn’t really about money”.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

Google sued over photo features in Pixel products

23 June 2023 Complaint filed by IP management firm alleges patent infringement over digital imaging technology | Google Pixel smartphones, Pixel Tablets and the Snapseed app are all listed in suit as alleged infringing devices.

Capcom settles ‘Resident Evil’ dispute with photographer

9 February 2022 A copyright infringement lawsuit over in-game art assets used in several games published by Capcom, including the “Resident Evil” series, has been dismissed, according to documents filed with the Connecticut district court.

Anthropic avoids damages risk in deal with authors over AI training

The slip-on shoe challenger hoping to trip up Skechers

‘This is not a rescue deal’: How an acquisition fits London firm's plan

Alston & Bird partner with strong Japanese ties jumps to new firm

Philips regains health tech patent in long-running dispute with Fitbit

China: Courts and AI face off

Renowned ITC litigator leaves Morgan Lewis to join competitor

‘Loopholes’ in ITC orders? Blindsided Masimo takes aim at US customs

Counsel Q&A: Why Richard Prince judgments are ‘very pro-art’

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles