Lawyers keenly-awaiting Arthrex showdown
The US Supreme Court’s decision to grant certiorari in US v Arthrex sets the stage for one of the most highly anticipated IP decisions of 2021, lawyers and stakeholders have told WIPR.
The court yesterday confirmed that it had agreed to review whether the appointment and oversight of Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) judges is unconstitutional.
Greg Morris, head of Honigman’s life sciences IP litigation practice, said the “high impact outcome would be a finding by the Supreme Court that the Federal Circuit’s fix of the law dealing with how PTAB judges can be removed from power is not valid”.
“We simply do not know what would happen next or if action would be required by Congress to right it,” Morris added.
In an impactful October 2019 decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that the appointment of administrative patent judges (APJs) was unlawful because they were not subject to sufficient oversight.
The decision has led to a slew of PTAB decisions being called into question and sent back by the Federal Circuit for review.
The Federal Circuit said it had solved the constitutional problem by giving the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) director to remove APJs from office.
But that remedy was opposed by the USPTO itself, which pushed for the Supreme Court’s review into the Federal Circuit’s decision.
“The court’s decision has far-reaching ramifications, as it impacts numerous final written decisions by the PTAB,” Aziz Burgy, partner at Axinn, said.
A statement from the US Inventor group, which has campaigned against the PTAB, said the “hopes and dreams of inventors were rekindled” with the Supreme Court’s granting of certiorari.
Josh Malone, a member of US Inventor, claimed the USPTO had been “reconfigured to protect large corporations from the threat of inventors with better ideas—there is no justification for denying inventors the right to a hearing before a qualified and impartial judge”.
A statement from Finnegan said the court’s decision would likely arrive in June 2021, at the end of the court’s current term.
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox
Today’s top stories
Ireland abolishes IP tax incentive
Canadian government appoints chair of Copyright Board
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk