istock-903857670_krblokhin
6 February 2018Patents

L’Oréal secures patent win at UK court

Cosmetics brand L’Oréal secured a patent infringement win yesterday at the English High Court.

L’Oréal had accused RN Ventures of infringing its patent and registered Community designs through the sale of a range of Magnitone electronic facial skin care devices, which use an oscillating circular head with rings of bristles arranged in concentric circles to deep-cleanse pores.

RN Ventures didn’t challenge the validity of the European patent (number 1,722,699 B1), instead arguing that the company had not infringed it. But it did argue that if the patent is infringed, then it is anticipated by or obvious in light of US patent application 2002/0156401 (Woog).

The ‘699 patent covers a “mechanical device suitable for the treatment of acne through the removal of sebum plugs from skin pores”, while Woog describes a “sonic therapeutic massaging cleaning and make-up application device”.

Mr Justice Henry Carr found that L’Oréal’s patent was not obvious in light of Woog and that RN Ventures had infringed claim 1.

At issue was the movement of the Magnitone devices. Stephen Franklin, a visiting professor at the University of Sheffield and an expert for L’Oréal, identified in his reports four types of movement he thought were exhibited by the bristle tufts of the Magnitone products.

Although Carr stated that two of the movements fell outside the patent claims, he added that in light of L’Oréal’s experiments, his assessment of the evidence and interpretation of claim 1, the other two movements fell within the patent claim.

L’Oréal had also made an application to amend claim 8 of the patent, an application which was granted by the court after L’Oréal said it was prepared to alter the proposed amendment so it was sufficiently clear.

On infringement of the registered designs, numbers 000407747-001 and 001175046-001, Carr said that Magnitone’s products created the “same overall impression” as the ‘747 design but not the ‘046.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.

Today’s top stories

Conor McGregor in the ring over multiple TM oppositions

Advocate general issues bad news to Louboutin over red-sole TM

Samsung asks US court to block Huawei’s Chinese injunction

Andrei Iancu confirmed as new USPTO director

WIPR survey: Readers back EU court in vulgar TM decision

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
17 January 2018   The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has set aside a decision that rejected a patent injunction against L’Oréal USA.
Trademarks
4 May 2016   Cosmetics brand L’Oréal has been dealt a blow after an EU court rejected its trademark application that had been opposed by a Portuguese company.