Kim Kardashian sues ‘derivative’ clothing range
Kim Kardashian West is suing UK women’s clothing company Missguided for trademark infringement, alleging that it used her name and image to sell products without her permission.
The model and reality TV star, along with her company Kimsaprincess, filed the suit in the US District Court for the Central District of California yesterday, February 20.
In the complaint, Kardashian alleged that Missguided’s “fast and inexpensive” business model was “often derivative of other companies’ designs, if not blatant knock-offs”.
Kardashian owns trademarks including variations of her name (US numbers 4,989,420; 4,978,865; and 4,516,079) in classes 35 and 41, covering advertising services and entertainment in the field of pop culture.
According to the suit, Missguided used the name and images of Kardashian and her sisters on its US websites to promote their “knock-off” goods.
“Missguided’s US website has included entire pages that are devoted solely to the sale of clothing inspired by Kardashian, and on which Kardashian’s name and likeness are prominently used without her permission”, the complaint said.
Kardashian’s suit included images of the web pages, which promoted Missguided’s products with the taglines “crushin’ on kim k” and “5 party looks inspired by Kim Kardashian”.
The reality TV star also cited a post on Missguided’s in response to a photo Kardashian had posted of herself.
The Missguided post, which tagged Kardashian’s account, featured a photo of a model in a “rip off” dress to the one Kardashian was wearing, saying “@KimKardashian you’ve only got a few days before this drops online”.
Kardashian also accused Missguided of using its Instagram account to post pictures of her with her husband, rapper Kanye West, and their children, in order to promote its brand.
“Missguided has so systematically misappropriated Kardashian’s name and likeness that the consuming public is likely to and has come to the mistaken conclusion that she is affiliated with Missguided”, the complaint said.
Kardashian is seeking damages of at least $10 million, and injunctive relief preventing any further infringement of her trademarks.
In a statement sent to WIPR, Missguided said that the company had not “received any notification of legal action, but in any event any action based on online banter would be meritless”.
“For the record, as much as we love her style, we’re not working with Kim on anything”, the statement added.
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk