• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Community & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
    • INTA 2026
  • In-house
  • Trademarks
  • Patents
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2026
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • China to introduce punitive damages for IP infringements
fruttipics-istockphoto-com-china-stamp-
13 April 2018Copyright

China to introduce punitive damages for IP infringements

China’s State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) has announced that the country will soon introduce punitive damages for IP infringements in an effort to ensure that offenders pay a “big price”.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Trademarks
Typical punitive damages in IP cases
22 October 2021   China’s official case studies offer IP owners a guide to getting results against infringers, say Haiyu Li and Haoyu Feng of Chofn IP.
Copyright
TriZetto's $570M punitive damages win ruled ‘excessive’
21 April 2021   Tech company Syntel was hit with “excessive punitive damages” when a New York jury delivered a $855 million verdict in favour of TriZetto, a US judge has found.
Trademarks
WIPR Leaders 2020: Serbia practice update
5 February 2020   Mina Jovanovic of Zivko Mijatovic & Partners explains why, despite best intentions, a law enforcing punitive damages claims is not fit for purpose.


Editor's picks

Exclusive: ‘When a judge wears their robe, they have no gender’
Unified Patent Court
Exclusive: ‘When a judge wears their robe, they have no gender’
9 June 2026

Editor's picks

Unified Patent Court
Exclusive: ‘When a judge wears their robe, they have no gender’
9 June 2026
Trademarks
EUIPO calls time on Aldi beer in ‘Budvar’ row
3 June 2026
Trademarks
‘No deal, Patagonia’ says Pattie Gonia amid controversial TM row
2 June 2026
Patents
Why enforced arbitration could fix 'dysfunctional' FRAND system
2 June 2026
Trademarks
Google found liable for TM infringement over keyword bidding
1 June 2026
Trademarks
Beyond ‘Use it or lose it’: Jaguar Land Rover counsel on the reality of modern brands
28 May 2026

More articles

Beauty brand boom spurs marked rise in UK trademark disputes
Gymshark fights off ‘GymBull’ TM based on pattern of parody
Can design patents stop dupes? Ugg owner takes test to trial
Global video streaming dispute to end with arbitration
INTA responds to post-London ‘feedback’ with new rates
Buchalter bags technical patent prosecutor, innovator and mentor
Nike wins latest round over ‘T90’ brand before World Cup
UK firm hires lawyer who beat Oatly to lead practice

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin