• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • China to introduce punitive damages for IP infringements
fruttipics-istockphoto-com-china-stamp-
13 April 2018Copyright

China to introduce punitive damages for IP infringements

China’s State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) has announced that the country will soon introduce punitive damages for IP infringements in an effort to ensure that offenders pay a “big price”.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Trademarks
Typical punitive damages in IP cases
22 October 2021   China’s official case studies offer IP owners a guide to getting results against infringers, say Haiyu Li and Haoyu Feng of Chofn IP.
Copyright
TriZetto's $570M punitive damages win ruled ‘excessive’
21 April 2021   Tech company Syntel was hit with “excessive punitive damages” when a New York jury delivered a $855 million verdict in favour of TriZetto, a US judge has found.
Trademarks
WIPR Leaders 2020: Serbia practice update
5 February 2020   Mina Jovanovic of Zivko Mijatovic & Partners explains why, despite best intentions, a law enforcing punitive damages claims is not fit for purpose.


Editor's picks

How we won $3m+ for an influencer against Impossible Foods
Trademarks
How we won $3m+ for an influencer against Impossible Foods
31 March 2026

Editor's picks

Trademarks
How we won $3m+ for an influencer against Impossible Foods
31 March 2026
Patents
How a hair curling patent dispute reached Europe’s highest court
27 March 2026
Trademarks
EU zeroes in on China’s e-commerce giants as AliExpress faces grilling
25 March 2026
AI
UK kicks the AI copyright can down the road: 5 takeaways for business
20 March 2026
AI
UK makes U-turn as government drops AI copyright exception
18 March 2026
Trademarks
Who owns a name? Katy Perry, Estée Lauder and Jo Malone test rights
16 March 2026

More articles

Lululemon beats Nike after judge kicks out $355k Flyknit verdict
GlobalBlock adds world's two largest country domains—centralised brand protection in more than 750 web extensions
Dior and L’Oréal fend off Chinese trademark challengers in Europe
How we won $3m+ for an influencer against Impossible Foods
Solar patent battle heats up with high-stakes ITC investigation
Charles Russell Speechlys promotes recently hired litigator to lead IP
World IP Review launches Global In-House Elite 2026
How a hair curling patent dispute reached Europe’s highest court

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin