• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
    • INTA 2026
  • Trademarks
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2026
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • China to introduce punitive damages for IP infringements
fruttipics-istockphoto-com-china-stamp-
13 April 2018Copyright

China to introduce punitive damages for IP infringements

China’s State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) has announced that the country will soon introduce punitive damages for IP infringements in an effort to ensure that offenders pay a “big price”.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Trademarks
Typical punitive damages in IP cases
22 October 2021   China’s official case studies offer IP owners a guide to getting results against infringers, say Haiyu Li and Haoyu Feng of Chofn IP.
Copyright
TriZetto's $570M punitive damages win ruled ‘excessive’
21 April 2021   Tech company Syntel was hit with “excessive punitive damages” when a New York jury delivered a $855 million verdict in favour of TriZetto, a US judge has found.
Trademarks
WIPR Leaders 2020: Serbia practice update
5 February 2020   Mina Jovanovic of Zivko Mijatovic & Partners explains why, despite best intentions, a law enforcing punitive damages claims is not fit for purpose.


Editor's picks

Google must give publishers opt-out choice from AI-driven search results
AI
Google must give publishers opt-out choice from AI-driven search results
4 June 2026

Editor's picks

AI
Google must give publishers opt-out choice from AI-driven search results
4 June 2026
Trademarks
‘No deal, Patagonia’ says Pattie Gonia amid controversial TM row
2 June 2026
Patents
Why enforced arbitration could fix 'dysfunctional' FRAND system
2 June 2026
Trademarks
Google found liable for TM infringement over keyword bidding
1 June 2026
Trademarks
Beyond ‘Use it or lose it’: Jaguar Land Rover counsel on the reality of modern brands
28 May 2026
Trade secrets
How should in-house teams adopt AI? ‘Carefully’, says secrets expert
26 May 2026

More articles

Padel trademarks rack up as UK filings grow 148%
Olympic committees secure injunction on wellness firm over ‘OlyLife’ TM
From Coca-Cola to Banksy: How much is a secret worth in IP?
Google must give publishers opt-out choice from AI-driven search results
UPC clarifies long-arm jurisdiction with pivotal ruling in ‘Fujifilm v Kodak’
EUIPO calls time on Aldi beer in ‘Budvar’ row
‘No deal, Patagonia’ says Pattie Gonia amid controversial TM row
Why enforced arbitration could fix 'dysfunctional' FRAND system

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin