• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • China to introduce punitive damages for IP infringements
fruttipics-istockphoto-com-china-stamp-
13 April 2018Copyright

China to introduce punitive damages for IP infringements

China’s State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) has announced that the country will soon introduce punitive damages for IP infringements in an effort to ensure that offenders pay a “big price”.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Trademarks
Typical punitive damages in IP cases
22 October 2021   China’s official case studies offer IP owners a guide to getting results against infringers, say Haiyu Li and Haoyu Feng of Chofn IP.
Copyright
TriZetto's $570M punitive damages win ruled ‘excessive’
21 April 2021   Tech company Syntel was hit with “excessive punitive damages” when a New York jury delivered a $855 million verdict in favour of TriZetto, a US judge has found.
Trademarks
WIPR Leaders 2020: Serbia practice update
5 February 2020   Mina Jovanovic of Zivko Mijatovic & Partners explains why, despite best intentions, a law enforcing punitive damages claims is not fit for purpose.


Editor's picks

SAP, Google, Goodyear: Hot summer cases at the Federal Circuit
Patents
SAP, Google, Goodyear: Hot summer cases at the Federal Circuit
23 July 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
SAP, Google, Goodyear: Hot summer cases at the Federal Circuit
23 July 2025
Patents
Thaler 2: AI-generated inventions return to the UK High Court
21 July 2025
Artificial Intelligence
Starjacking and reverse engineering: How AI is changing IP crime
18 July 2025
Patents
‘Written submissions cannot be underestimated’: How G1/23 changed European prior art rules
18 July 2025
Trademarks
Iceland Foods TM frozen out of EU by Nordic country
16 July 2025
Patents
UK launches SEPs consultation in bid to tackle inefficiency
15 July 2025

More articles

Propel Fuels nets $883m in trade secrets dispute
FRAND in the UK part 2: Interim licences and other jurisdictions
WATCH: Beyond patents — the evolving role of IP lawyers in life sciences
Four-lawyer team joins Cozen O’Connor’s new San Diego office
Netlist strikes Samsung with fresh suit over semiconductor claims
Apple v Masimo: Could a Fed Circ decision limit patent cases at the ITC?
Skechers targeted over ‘Slip-in’ shoes' hands-free tech
South Korea: Trademarks (contentious) Q&A

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin