• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Australian Parliament approves site-blocking law despite criticisms
istock-687986272-erhui1979
28 November 2018Copyright

Australian Parliament approves site-blocking law despite criticisms

The Australian Parliament today voted to expand the country’s website-blocking laws despite fierce opposition from industry associations.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

article
Group representing Twitter and Google criticises Australia’s copyright plans
26 November 2018   An industry group which represents organisations such as Twitter, Facebook, Yahoo, and Google has told an Australian Senate committee that the country’s plans to expand website blocking laws are “unprecedented and unnecessary”.


Editor's picks

UK kicks the AI copyright can down the road: 5 takeaways for business
AI
UK kicks the AI copyright can down the road: 5 takeaways for business
20 March 2026

Editor's picks

AI
UK kicks the AI copyright can down the road: 5 takeaways for business
20 March 2026
Trademarks
Who owns a name? Katy Perry, Estée Lauder and Jo Malone test rights
16 March 2026
Trade secrets
How we won: The irony of a trade secrets courtroom exposé
16 March 2026
Trademarks
INTA: ‘New normal’ for in-house counsel as budgets fall
13 March 2026
Patents
Market turbulence and AI tops agenda at Chicago event
6 March 2026
Trademarks
Louis Vuitton loses ‘Frankenstein products’ battle
26 February 2026

More articles

UK kicks the AI copyright can down the road: 5 takeaways for business
WIPO launches initiative to evolve IP infrastructure in age of AI
UK makes U-turn as government drops AI copyright exception
Britannica sues OpenAI over ‘cannibalising’ traffic
Who owns a name? Katy Perry, Estée Lauder and Jo Malone test rights
Taylor Wessing boosts London practice with another RPC alumnus
IP Europe appoints ex-Walt Disney policy and advocacy expert
‘Big Five’ publishers sue shadow library over alleged AI developer links

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin