• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • INTA 2024
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • US: To patent, or not to patent?
shutterstock_1411533860_zerbor
12 November 2021CopyrightPaul J Sutton

US: To patent, or not to patent?

Individuals and companies are often faced with the very significant decision involving inventions, namely: to patent, or not to patent?

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
Patent lawsuits and damages on the rise in US
15 March 2021   Patent lawsuits saw an annual rise in the US last year for the first time since 2015, largely driven by a small number of high-volume litigants.
Patents
USITC attorney backs BAT in Philip Morris patent dispute
27 January 2021   An attorney for the US International Trade Commission has recommended that the Commission find Philip Morris International to have infringed British American Tobacco’s patents, which would likely lead to PMI’s IQOS products being excluded from the US market as early as November 2021.


Editor's picks

Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025
AI
UK delays AI bill at pivotal moment as High Court hears Getty case
9 June 2025
Artificial Intelligence
Getty v Stability AI: High stakes at the High Court
6 June 2025
Trademarks
AI, lipstick deals and mental health: What’s on CITMA president’s radar?
9 May 2025
Patents
Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history
2 May 2025
Patents
US-China tariffs: What hope is there for IP rightsholders?
1 May 2025

More articles

‘Cynical and bewildering’: UK omits copyright protections in Data Bill
PierFerd taps experts in trade secrets and USPTO proceedings
‘Any copying was done by Getty lawyers’: Stability AI hits back
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
BSH v Electrolux: A US perspective on cross-border patent enforcement
Davis Wright Tremaine adds founding duo from Knobbe Martens
Getty slams Stability’s ‘distorted AI rubbish’ in opening arguments
Getty v Stability AI: High stakes at the High Court

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin