• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • SCOTUS weighs Cox v Sony: A test of global ISP liability
jackpress / Shutterstock.com
3 December 2025NewsCopyrightMuireann Bolger

SCOTUS weighs Cox v Sony: A test of global ISP liability

With billions of dollars at stake and repercussions across the global digital ecosystem, the ruling could influence the future scope of ISP responsibilities and liability worldwide.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Trademarks
The $53m cutback to $1: Lessons from MGA Entertainment v OMG Girlz
4 August 2025   The slashing of damages in a case involving MGA shows brand owners that punitive damages rarely go unchecked by federal district court judges, say Mark Sommers and Maxime Jarquin of Finnegan.
Copyright
F-AI-R use: Lessons on genAI training in Anthropic and Meta
9 July 2025   Two pivotal rulings regarding the use of copyrighted works to train genAI models may reshape the legal landscape for developers, rights holders, and AI platforms, writes Michael Graif of Brown Rudnick.


Editor's picks

US in-house counsel brace for funder-fuelled litigation in 2026
In-House
US in-house counsel brace for funder-fuelled litigation in 2026
16 January 2026

Editor's picks

In-House
US in-house counsel brace for funder-fuelled litigation in 2026
16 January 2026   A survey by Norton Rose Fulbright reveals that trademark disputes and third-party litigation funding risks are on the minds of US corporate counsel.
Patents
What IPR and PGR institutions mean under USPTO director Squires
12 January 2026
Copyright
Top Gun: Maverick suit nosedives on copyright and contract claims
5 January 2026
Patents
PTAB year in review: A shifting landscape and outlook for 2026
2 January 2026
Patents
UPC: A review of 2025 and what to expect in 2026
30 December 2025
In-House
Three in-house counsel perspectives on 2025–2026: Part 2
24 December 2025

More articles

Senior USPTO solicitor steps into private practice
US in-house counsel brace for funder-fuelled litigation in 2026
Final call: Who are the world’s best in-house counsel?
AI is powering a new wave of online abuse—and brands must adapt
ITC to probe Oura Ring after Samsung retaliates, seeking import ban
SCOTUS rejects prestige label’s bid to register French name
What IPR and PGR institutions mean under USPTO director Squires
Appian and Pega head back to court after $2bn verdict quashed

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

Copyright © worldipreview.com 2024   |   Headless Content Management with Blaze