• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Community & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
    • INTA 2026
  • In-house
  • Trademarks
  • Patents
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Influential Women in IP 2026
    • Leaders 2026
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Littlewoods handed unwanted seasonal lawsuit
13 December 2013Copyright

Littlewoods handed unwanted seasonal lawsuit

Online retailer Littlewoods is facing a lawsuit from an Irish company following a dispute over the design for a Christmas jumper.

Portlaoise-based Zatori Results Ltd claims Littlewoods has infringed its design by manufacturing a jumper almost identical to one it sold last year.

It has taken the case to the Irish High Court, where it is expected to be heard within the next week.

The disputed design includes a snowman in the middle of the jumper surrounded by stars and a moon and sleigh. It has two Christmas trees on either side of the snowman against a blue background.

Zatori, which employs 87 people, sells items, including clothing online and says Littlewoods is offering a similar jumper for sale on various websites.

In an affidavit, on Wednesday December 11, Ronan O’Brien, the founder of Zatori, said he had designed the jumper for last year’s Christmas market.

He noted that on the defendant’s websites they had started selling a jumper which, despite having slight differences, including the omission of the moon and sleigh, was almost identical to the Zatori design.

The original jumper, made of a mix of good quality wool and acrylic, was sold through its website clothing.ie and was one of the top selling Christmas jumpers on online retailer Amazon.

Sarah Byrt, partner at Mayer Brown LLP, in London, said Zatori was relying on its unregistered design right, an EU-wide right [EU Council Regulation 6/2002], which lasts for three years and helps those in the fashion sector protect seasonal designs which don’t need the extra cost involved in getting a registration.

“Since the Littlewoods jumper apparently doesn’t include the moon and reindeer-drawn sleigh which also feature in the Zatori design, Zatori will have to show that its rights are nevertheless being infringed by arguing that the Littlewoods jumper gives the same ‘overall impression’ on the ‘informed user’,” Byrt said.

Zatori is seeking an interim injunction preventing the defendant from continuing to offer the jumper for sale. It is also seeking damages for the alleged infringement of its unregistered design rights.

Byrt added that, given the seasonal nature of the product, Zatori was using an “emergency procedure”.

“It looks as though the decision on an interim injunction, which will come before the Irish court in the next few days, if successful, it would order Littlewoods to stop selling straight away,” Byrt said.

Mr Justice Sean Ryan said he would deal with the matter within the next week.

Littlewoods and Zatori both declined to comment.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk




Editor's picks

UKIPO’s veto of Emotional Perception patent is ‘not good for the economy’
AI
UKIPO’s veto of Emotional Perception patent is ‘not good for the economy’
2 October 2026

Editor's picks

AI
UKIPO’s veto of Emotional Perception patent is ‘not good for the economy’
2 October 2026
Trademarks
Lidl and P&G counsel: Greenwashing claims underpriced as litigation risks rise
28 September 2026
Patents
Legal lender may scoop $1.4bn of $5.7bn patent verdict against Apple
28 September 2026
Patents
The data centre boom: What IP owners and implementers need to know
25 September 2026
In-House
American Airlines proves the sky is the limit for IP-backed loans
24 September 2026
In-House
Arm interview: The IP team helping to ship 900 computer chips a second
24 September 2026

More articles

INTA updates pricing after ‘listening’ to members’ concerns about costs
Why Thomson Reuters v Ross is no ‘ordinary copyright case’
Temu unveils new GI protection to support local producers and brand owners
Griffith Hack taps new practice leader with trademark expertise
Lego loses ‘fair use’ arguments in Queer Eye jacket copyright dispute
Thomson Reuters scores landmark AI copyright win in US appeals court
Clifford Chance recruits new head of Asia-Pac
Lidl and P&G counsel: Greenwashing claims underpriced as litigation risks rise

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin