Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far

The high-profile Getty v Stability AI case has shown why it’s important to define claims clearly and review them regularly throughout a trial, while also sending a wake-up call to AI developers.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?

20 June 2025 Getty v Stability AI raises key secondary infringement questions on whether AI models are ‘infringing articles’ l Court ruling could restrict AI models trained outside UK from being offered to UK users l AI training declarations ‘may become key for copyright compliance’.

Getty bid to broaden claim shut down by Court of Appeal

17 June 2025 Court of Appeal blocks Getty’s attempt to include CSAM in Stability AI lawsuit | Judge says claim came too late despite mentioning “violent and pornographic” outputs from Stable Diffusion | Trial resumes at the High Court.

‘Any copying was done by Getty lawyers’: Stability AI hits back

11 June 2025 Stability claimed Getty’s legal team was cherry-picking outputs after “hammering away at the model” to create infringing evidence, finds Marisa Woutersen from the courtroom.

Getty drops primary copyright claims against Stability AI

Dream Pairs 2—Iconix 1: A CoA rebuke

Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy

How IP firms can champion LGBTQ+ staff beyond Pride 2025

BREAKING: Key post-sale confusion ruling ‘welcomed’ by brand owners

Rockit lands win of ‘great significance’ in China over apple tube packaging

Iconix v Dream Pairs: UK court to decide on TM ‘as seen from above’

AI patent trends signal tomorrow’s technologies

Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles