• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • China recommends trademark law overhaul
3 July 2013Copyright

China recommends trademark law overhaul

China has announced tough new measures to protect trademarks in the country, including doubling the maximum level of damages for infringement.

According to amendments to the country’s trademark law, entities could now be charged up to 2 million Yuan, the equivalent of $325,000.

Initially a maximum fine of 1 million Yuan was outlined, but a second draft, currently being read at a meeting of the Standing Committee, a body within the National People’s Congress (NPC), has recommended the higher amount.

The Standing Committee, which modifies legislation set out by the governmental body the NPC, is also demanding that trademark agencies ensure they inform clients if they suspect a trademark may infringe on others’.

According to Thomas Pattloch, partner at Taylor Wessing LLP, the proposed changes show that China is willing to “change direction” in its efforts to combat trademark infringement and squatting.

Pattloch, who specialises in Chinese IP rights, told WIPR: “The level of trademark infringement, trademark squatting and multiple attacks on well-known brands continues to be very prominent in China.

“The increase [in fines] certainly is a deliberate sign by the government. It says that counterfeiting is no longer welcome.”

However, concerns have been expressed over the proposed increase in fines, with fears that it may not have a strong impact on trademark infringement, given that decisions on suspected infringement are often made by local officials.

“In reality, fines - especially against domestic infringers - tend to be very low, even if the law allows much higher punishment, as much is left to the discretion of local officials,” Pattloch added.

“It will depend on their [local officials] willingness to change old perceptions and actively apply the new law whether it can produce the desired effect of a better trademark environment."

The draft also offers protection for renowned trademarks, giving owners the power to ban others from registering their trademarks or using similar ones, even if theirs are not registered in China.

Pattoch added: “Many of the proposals go in the right direction and try to enhance trademark protection. As Chinese industry matures, a more predictable and reliable trademark system is needed, not only for foreign brand owners, but even more for upcoming domestic enterprises.”

The amendments should be passed by the Standing Committee this year and could be formally introduced by the middle of 2014.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Trademarks
Lessons learned: China’s first-to-file TM system
27 February 2020   Leighton Cassidy and Thomas Coop of Fieldfisher outline recent cases highlighting the importance of filing early trademark applications in China’s first-to-file system, and the key takeaways for brand owners.


Editor's picks

A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025
Future of IP
‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out
20 June 2025
Trademarks
Creative licence: Inside the LEGO Group’s Asia playbook
16 June 2025
Copyright
‘Cynical and bewildering’: UK omits copyright protections in Data Bill
13 June 2025
Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025
AI
Getty slams Stability’s ‘distorted AI rubbish’ in opening arguments
10 June 2025

More articles

‘Here to stay’: UKIPO unveils ‘interesting’ SkyKick roadmap
Champagne makers raise glass to key EU ruling on PDOs
Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman
Life after Iconix v Dream Pairs: Key lessons for brand owners
Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far
Dream Pairs 2—Iconix 1: A CoA rebuke
Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy
BREAKING: Key post-sale confusion ruling ‘welcomed’ by brand owners

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin