shutterstock_1218220324_everything_possible

26 May 2023FeaturesCopyrightMarisa Woutersen

AI ingestion of IP is fair use, says ex-USCO counsel

The processing of copyrighted work by artificial intelligence (AI) when training models should be considered fair use, according to a former general counsel of the US Copyright Office (USCO).

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Judge orders attorneys to declare non-use of AI

1 June 2023 Texas judge issues order requiring all briefs to have not been created using generative AI tools | Platforms such as ChatGPT ‘make stuff up’ and are ‘unbound by any sense of duty, honour, or justice’, he said | EU hints at AI code of conduct 'within weeks'.

Reaction: UK scraps radical AI mining proposals

Artistic licence?: Stability AI v Getty Images

26 January 2023 In the first of a two-part series on art and AI, Muireann Bolger explores a case that opens a Pandora's box of issues over the use of unlicensed creative works.

Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman

Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far

Getty drops primary copyright claims against Stability AI

Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy

How IP firms can champion LGBTQ+ staff beyond Pride 2025

A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion

What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?

Vidal: Settled expectations factor is ‘unconstitutional overreach’

AI ingestion of IP is fair use, says ex-USCO counsel

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles