‘I hate this rule’: the FTC's controversial non-competes ban
17-01-2023
Khan sworn in as chair of US FTC
17-06-2021
DCStockPhotography / Shutterstock.com
Last week, the Federal Trade Commission intervened in several disputes over standard-essential patents, including a Federal Circuit row between technology firm Philips and aerospace and defence company Thales.
In a statement of public interest filed on May 16, FTC chair Lina Khan and commissioner Rebecca Slaughter urged the US International Trade Commission (ITC) to consider the impact that issuing an exclusion order against a willing licensee (ie Thales) would have on competition and consumers in the US.
The ITC, an independent body, has powers under section 337 of the Tariff Act to issue exclusion orders, which essentially ban the importation of products deemed to infringe US patents, subject to certain ‘public interest’ exceptions.
The lawsuit in question, heard in the US District Court of Delaware, saw Philips appeal to the ITC to issue an exclusion order on its patented wireless module products, which it claimed Thales had infringed in some of its components, including in aeroplanes, which implement cellular standards—especially 3G and 4G.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com
SEPs, FRAND, FTC, ITC, Philips v Thales, Lisa Khan, US, antitrust
