niroworld-shutterstock-com-us-court-gavel-2-

10 October 2016Trademarks

WIPR survey: Readers weigh in on Slants trademark dispute

WIPR readers have said that section 2(a) of the Lanham Act is not “facially invalid under the free speech clause of the First Amendment”, in a reference to the In re Tam trademark case.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

INTA-WIPR gender diversity report reveals ongoing biases for women in TMs

Provocative trademarks: balancing rights with morality in the EU

TikTok must face US allegations of source code theft

Jury awards $19.4m to ex-Qualcomm unit after rival infringed fleet management tech

Lewis Roca promotes aerospace and tech expert to managing partner

Olympic committees named in suit over Paris2024 domain

Abion sets sights on Italian market with new Milan office

Womble adds former USPTO patent examiner to grow Denver office

WIPR survey: Readers weigh in on Slants trademark dispute

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles