20 January 2023TrademarksSarah Speight

Rogers wrongly applied in Jack Daniel’s TM case: US govt

US government claims an appeals court erred in an earlier judgment that favoured opposition | Lanham Act "incorrectly" applied in parody dog toy dispute | Case could create a “sea change” for trademark cases.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

Dogfight: SCOTUS favours big brands in JD’s First Amendment clash

9 June 2023 The Bad Spaniels case pitted the might of America Inc against a core principle of the US Constitution. Now that the country’s highest court has weighed in, what does this mean for brands?

Trademarks

Jack Daniel’s showdown arrives at SCOTUS

22 March 2023 Duo of major cases appear before top US court | Justices tackle parody, freedom of speech, artistically relevant defences and extra-territorial trademark disputes | Herrick, Feinstein | Hanson Bridgett.

Trademarks

Jack Daniel’s lambasts ‘dangerous’ dog toy judgment

13 March 2023 Jack Daniel’s accuses a court of eviscerating the core protections of trademark law | Ruling could have “staggering implications for consumers and mark owners” | Jack Daniel’s accused of muzzling free speech by opponent.

Netlist counsel: How we beat Samsung in computer chip clash, again

Under Armour continues winning streak with ‘Kings Armor’ victory

Cleary Gottlieb brings in five-partner team from Latham & Watkins

‘A craven attempt to sacrifice the rule of law’: Firms draw lines in face of Trump assault

Acting USPTO director enacts new PTAB policy with Motorola decision

Nokia and Amazon resolve global dispute over Prime Video and streaming devices

London firm adds two experienced partners

Biscoff maker's EU red and white colour mark crumbles

Rogers wrongly applied in Jack Daniel’s TM case: US govt

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles