shutterstock_1226709739_denphotos
22 February 2023PatentsLiz Hockley

White House gives green light to potential Apple Watch import ban

Biden will not overturn ITC ruling on import ban | AliveCor patent dispute with Apple is ongoing.

President Biden will not overturn an International Trade Commission (ITC) ruling that could halt imports of the Apple Watch into the US, it was announced on Tuesday, February 21.

The ITC’s decision relates to a patent infringement dispute between Apple and AliveCor, a medical device company based in California.

AliveCor has accused Apple of infringing three electrocardiogram (ECG) patents covering its KardiaBand, a wearable heart monitor.

Upholding AliveCor’s complaint, the ITC said that imports of the infringing watches should be banned, but that this would be placed on hold until appeals were finished at the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTAB). The PTAB found in December that AliveCor’s patents were invalid, a decision the company is contesting.

Apple is arguing that the ITC’s import ban would negatively affect public health. The Hill reports that the tech giant hired former chairwoman of the ITC Shara Aranoff to lobby on its behalf, in an effort to convince Biden to block the ban.

But the office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) told The Hill that USTR chief Katherine Tai had made the decision not to intervene.

Presidential vetoes of ITC import bans are rare, but have happened in the past if the impact on US consumers and competitiveness is deemed to be too severe.

Patent dispute

The KardiaBand was the first FDA-cleared ECG wristband designed to be used as an accessory with the Apple Watch. From Series 4, the Apple Watch featured built-in ECG monitoring.

AliveCor told the ITC that Apple had copied its technology and driven it out of the market by making its operating system incompatible with the KardiaBand.

In 2021, the company released a statement saying that taking its complaint to the ITC “is one step, among others, AliveCor is taking to obtain relief for Apple’s intentional copying of AliveCor’s patented technology—including the ability to take an ECG reading on the Apple Watch, and to perform heartrate analysis—as well as Apple’s efforts to eliminate AliveCor as competition in the heartrate analysis market for the Apple Watch.”

Apple has gone on the offensive and is countersuing AliveCor for alleged patent infringement in San Francisco federal court.

In December, Apple said that AliveCor filed the lawsuits in response to “its own failures in the market” and said it wants to “set the record straight as to who is the real pioneer” of the technology, as reported by Reuters.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox.

Today’s top stories

Litigation funding booms despite trolls’ shadow

Across the border: global enforcement of trade secrets

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
25 May 2021   The US International Trade Commission will launch an investigation into Apple over potential infringement of electrocardiogram patents by Apple.
Patents
14 January 2020   Masimo, a company specialising in medical technology products, is suing Apple for allegedly stealing trade secrets and infringing multiple patents related to the Apple Watch.
Patents
25 May 2023   US solicitor general urges Supreme Court to reject Apple and Broadcom appeal over patent suit | SG Prelogar also backs Google in breach-of-contract song lyrics case.