Under Armour on the offensive, days after Lululemon settlement
Less than a week after settling its trade dress and design patent infringement case with rival Lululemon, clothing company Under Armour has asked a US court to declare it has not infringed two trademarks.
Filed (pdf) at the US District Court for the District of Maryland yesterday, November 1, the apparel company stated that “a declaratory ruling is necessary to clarify Under Armour’s rights in the phrases ‘I can do all things’ and ‘I can. I will.’”.
The dispute revolves around a line of products sold by Under Armour and associated with former basketball player Stephen Curry, who had on his shoes the phrase “I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me”, from the Bible verse, Philippians 4:13.
In January, Under Armour allegedly received a cease-and-desist letter from Battle Fashions stating that the clothing company had infringed its ‘ICAN’ trademark, US registration number 3081141.
“Under Armour responded to defendants explaining, among other things, that it was using ‘I Can’ as part of formative and descriptive phrases, such as ‘I Can Do All Things’, and that the use was a fair use,” the filing read.
Under Armour concluded in saying that Battle Fashions continues to allege infringement and therefore a declaratory judgment of non-infringement is required along with attorneys’ fees and a jury trial.
On Thursday, October 26, Under Armour settled its differences with Lululemon in a dispute over sports bras.
Lululemon claimed that Under Armour had used patented designs, US numbers D709,668 and D759,942, without permission.
The patents cover a bra design with four interwoven segments of fabric, two of which extend from each shoulder.
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.
Today’s top stories:
ESPN must face copyright case over American football documentary
Leason Ellis makes three appointments in New York office
Fish & Richardson hires Patterson + Sheridan partner
Federal Circuit affirms Delaware Alice decision
London black cabs lack distinctive character, appeals court affirms
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk