Trademark appeal judges at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) have upheld a decision that ‘Mott’s’ cannot be trademarked because it is “merely a surname”.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at email@example.com
mott's, US Patent and Trademark Office, intent-to-use trademarks, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, acquired distinctiveness