SCOTUS must restore fairness in patent court selection, says EFF
The US Supreme Court must end the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas’ grip on patent litigation, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).
The plea to restore fairness in court selection forms part of the EFF’s amicus brief, filed this month, in the TC Heartland v Kraft Foods case.
In December last year, the Supreme Court granted TC Heartland’s writ of certiorari, which was filed in September.
Kraft sued at the US District Court for the District of Delaware and TC Heartland unsuccessfully asked the judge to transfer the case to the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.
TC Heartland appealed against the decision to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
This is not the first time the EFF has waded into the fray. When TC Heartland appealed, the EFF asked the court to change the rules surrounding where patent cases can be filed in order to limit the number of lawsuits at the Eastern District of Texas, a popular destination for patent claims.
But in April last year, WIPR reported that the appeals court denied TC Heartland’s petition for a writ of mandamus.
The EFF’s latest brief urged the Supreme Court to overturn the decision, which it claimed “tilted the scales in favour of patent trolls by making it easier for them to venue shop and file lawsuits in certain courts”.
It added that venue-shopping is an “insidious practice” and that some courts have engaged in an “even more insidious practice” known as forum-selling—actively encouraging patent lawsuits in their districts.
“One such court is the Eastern District of Texas, a rural area with almost no manufacturing, research or technology facilities, where more than one-third of all patent cases in the country were filed last year,” said the EFF.
Vera Ranieri, staff attorney at the EFF, added: “The Supreme Court can fix a rampant problem in patent law and make the process more fair and balanced. As it stands, many defendants can be hauled into court in any corner of the country, regardless of whether the location has anything to do with either party.”
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk