20 January 2023TrademarksSarah Speight

Rogers wrongly applied in Jack Daniel’s TM case: US govt

US government claims an appeals court erred in an earlier judgment that favoured opposition | Lanham Act "incorrectly" applied in parody dog toy dispute | Case could create a “sea change” for trademark cases.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

Dogfight: SCOTUS favours big brands in JD’s First Amendment clash

9 June 2023 The Bad Spaniels case pitted the might of America Inc against a core principle of the US Constitution. Now that the country’s highest court has weighed in, what does this mean for brands?

Trademarks

Jack Daniel’s showdown arrives at SCOTUS

22 March 2023 Duo of major cases appear before top US court | Justices tackle parody, freedom of speech, artistically relevant defences and extra-territorial trademark disputes | Herrick, Feinstein | Hanson Bridgett.

Trademarks

Jack Daniel’s lambasts ‘dangerous’ dog toy judgment

13 March 2023 Jack Daniel’s accuses a court of eviscerating the core protections of trademark law | Ruling could have “staggering implications for consumers and mark owners” | Jack Daniel’s accused of muzzling free speech by opponent.

‘Here to stay’: UKIPO unveils ‘interesting’ SkyKick roadmap

Champagne makers raise glass to key EU ruling on PDOs

Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman

Life after Iconix v Dream Pairs: Key lessons for brand owners

Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far

Dream Pairs 2—Iconix 1: A CoA rebuke

Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy

How IP firms can champion LGBTQ+ staff beyond Pride 2025

Rogers wrongly applied in Jack Daniel’s TM case: US govt

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles