• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Community & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
    • INTA 2026
  • In-house
  • Trademarks
  • Patents
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Influential Women in IP 2026
    • Leaders 2026
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Reaction: SCOTUS mulls H&M copyright dispute with Unicolors
sorbis-shutterstock-com-h-m-
9 November 2021CopyrightMuireann Bolger

Reaction: SCOTUS mulls H&M copyright dispute with Unicolors

The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has scrutinised a major copyright dispute between  H&M and Unicolors, after finding faults with a judgment handed down by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit last year.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
A stitch in time: Untangling H&M v Unicolors
17 March 2022   The ruling may excuse unwitting copyright registration errors but lawyers are divided over its future impact, finds Muireann Bolger.
Patents
SCOTUS calls for fed govt input on defining patent terms
11 January 2022   The US Supreme Court has asked the federal government to weigh in on whether a ruling that reversed a $1.7 million jury verdict in a patent dispute between Olaf Sööt Design and Daktronics was a judicial abuse of authority.
Trademarks
SCOTUS declines to review France’s trademark win
14 December 2021   The French government remains protected by the principle of sovereign immunity from allegations of trademark infringement over a domain name after the US Supreme Court declined to revisit an earlier ruling.


Editor's picks

No ‘piggy-backing’: Hasbro wins sweeping order in Peppa case
Copyright
No ‘piggy-backing’: Hasbro wins sweeping order in Peppa case
30 July 2026

Editor's picks

Copyright
No ‘piggy-backing’: Hasbro wins sweeping order in Peppa case
30 July 2026
AI
Are you listening, Prime Minister?
24 July 2026
Patents
Second UPC injunction piles pressure on Disney
24 July 2026
Patents
What UK intellectual property wants from the new prime minister
20 July 2026
Trademarks
New entrants and market shifts: WIPR unveils UK Trademark Rankings 2026
17 July 2026
Trade secrets
5 things to know about Apple’s trade secrets suit against OpenAI
13 July 2026

More articles

Arent Fox hires ‘powerhouse’ team at new Silicon Valley office
Former senior attorney-advisor to ITC commissioners joins Mintz
Kirkland clears conflicts hurdle in trade secrets spat
Jack Daniel’s loses latest round in ‘Bad Spaniels’ trademark saga
Samsung inks patent licence deal worth up to $750m with Netlist
Brown Rudnick lands largest lateral IP team hire in firm history
Nvidia faces shareholder suit over AI training and ‘fraudulent scheme’
Exclusive: Winston Taylor’s UK head of IP on pitching $1.75bn firm’s ‘humble, but lethal’ practice

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin