• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Trade Secrets Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Reaction: SCOTUS mulls H&M copyright dispute with Unicolors
sorbis-shutterstock-com-h-m-
9 November 2021CopyrightMuireann Bolger

Reaction: SCOTUS mulls H&M copyright dispute with Unicolors

The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has scrutinised a major copyright dispute between  H&M and Unicolors, after finding faults with a judgment handed down by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit last year.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
A stitch in time: Untangling H&M v Unicolors
17 March 2022   The ruling may excuse unwitting copyright registration errors but lawyers are divided over its future impact, finds Muireann Bolger.
Patents
SCOTUS calls for fed govt input on defining patent terms
11 January 2022   The US Supreme Court has asked the federal government to weigh in on whether a ruling that reversed a $1.7 million jury verdict in a patent dispute between Olaf Sööt Design and Daktronics was a judicial abuse of authority.
Trademarks
SCOTUS declines to review France’s trademark win
14 December 2021   The French government remains protected by the principle of sovereign immunity from allegations of trademark infringement over a domain name after the US Supreme Court declined to revisit an earlier ruling.


Editor's picks

Four firms reach highest tier in WIPR’s 2025 Global Trade Secrets Rankings
Trade secrets
Four firms reach highest tier in WIPR’s 2025 Global Trade Secrets Rankings
18 August 2025

Editor's picks

Trade secrets
Four firms reach highest tier in WIPR’s 2025 Global Trade Secrets Rankings
18 August 2025
Future of IP
Trump’s tariffs: Will your TMs survive the trade wars?
13 August 2025
Patents
Why Trump’s revenue-raising patent plan is rife with problems
12 August 2025
Patents
In focus: EPO's landmark G1/25 referral and what it could mean
5 August 2025
Trademarks
The $53m cutback to $1: Lessons from MGA Entertainment v OMG Girlz
4 August 2025
Trade secrets
Propel Fuels nets $883m in trade secrets dispute
1 August 2025

More articles

Artist challenges US Copyright Office decision over image that used AI
Latham & Watkins welcomes back partner after a year at rival firm
Anthropic avoids damages risk in deal with authors over AI training
The slip-on shoe challenger hoping to trip up Skechers
‘This is not a rescue deal’: How an acquisition fits London firm's plan
Alston & Bird partner with strong Japanese ties jumps to new firm
Philips regains health tech patent in long-running dispute with Fitbit
China: Courts and AI face off

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin