• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
  • INTA 2026
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2026
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Reaction: SCOTUS mulls H&M copyright dispute with Unicolors
sorbis-shutterstock-com-h-m-
9 November 2021CopyrightMuireann Bolger

Reaction: SCOTUS mulls H&M copyright dispute with Unicolors

The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has scrutinised a major copyright dispute between  H&M and Unicolors, after finding faults with a judgment handed down by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit last year.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
A stitch in time: Untangling H&M v Unicolors
17 March 2022   The ruling may excuse unwitting copyright registration errors but lawyers are divided over its future impact, finds Muireann Bolger.
Patents
SCOTUS calls for fed govt input on defining patent terms
11 January 2022   The US Supreme Court has asked the federal government to weigh in on whether a ruling that reversed a $1.7 million jury verdict in a patent dispute between Olaf Sööt Design and Daktronics was a judicial abuse of authority.
Trademarks
SCOTUS declines to review France’s trademark win
14 December 2021   The French government remains protected by the principle of sovereign immunity from allegations of trademark infringement over a domain name after the US Supreme Court declined to revisit an earlier ruling.


Editor's picks

WATCH: Olaplex head of IP shares what's on the minds of in-house counsel at INTA 2026
In-House
WATCH: Olaplex head of IP shares what's on the minds of in-house counsel at INTA 2026
4 May 2026

Editor's picks

In-House
WATCH: Olaplex head of IP shares what's on the minds of in-house counsel at INTA 2026
4 May 2026
Trademarks
WATCH: London hosting INTA is a ‘privilege’
3 May 2026
Patents
Brussels under scrutiny for IP policy as US flags risks to innovation
1 May 2026
AI
Taylor Swift turns to trademarks over ‘blank space’ in AI law
29 April 2026
In-House
In-house interview: Why tackling piracy is ‘like the war on drugs’
29 April 2026
Patents
Start to finish: Marathon milestone highlights IP’s role in sport
27 April 2026

More articles

UK grants first $392m FRAND cross-licence in Samsung v ZTE dispute
INTA lands in London
WIPR launches newly revised Leaders 2026 list
Creating a global online IP community
Brussels under scrutiny for IP policy as US flags risks to innovation
Fed Circ delivers mixed ruling in FedEx IPR appeal involving Qualcomm
In-house interview: Why tackling piracy is ‘like the war on drugs’
Duracell cannot cut power to BASF’s secrets complaint

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin