• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Community & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
    • INTA 2026
  • In-house
  • Trademarks
  • Patents
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Influential Women in IP 2026
    • Leaders 2026
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Reaction: SCOTUS mulls H&M copyright dispute with Unicolors
sorbis-shutterstock-com-h-m-
9 November 2021CopyrightMuireann Bolger

Reaction: SCOTUS mulls H&M copyright dispute with Unicolors

The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has scrutinised a major copyright dispute between  H&M and Unicolors, after finding faults with a judgment handed down by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit last year.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
A stitch in time: Untangling H&M v Unicolors
17 March 2022   The ruling may excuse unwitting copyright registration errors but lawyers are divided over its future impact, finds Muireann Bolger.
Patents
SCOTUS calls for fed govt input on defining patent terms
11 January 2022   The US Supreme Court has asked the federal government to weigh in on whether a ruling that reversed a $1.7 million jury verdict in a patent dispute between Olaf Sööt Design and Daktronics was a judicial abuse of authority.
Trademarks
SCOTUS declines to review France’s trademark win
14 December 2021   The French government remains protected by the principle of sovereign immunity from allegations of trademark infringement over a domain name after the US Supreme Court declined to revisit an earlier ruling.


Editor's picks

SEPs: UK rejects FRAND rate-setting plan
Patents
SEPs: UK rejects FRAND rate-setting plan
13 October 2026

Editor's picks

Patents
SEPs: UK rejects FRAND rate-setting plan
13 October 2026
Copyright
Birkenstock rulings expose Europe's 'functional' faultline
8 October 2026
Trademarks
‘I am Giorgia Meloni’: Can a trademark protect politicians from AI deepfakes?
7 October 2026
AI
UKIPO’s veto of Emotional Perception patent is ‘not good for the economy’
2 October 2026
Trademarks
INTA updates pricing after ‘listening’ to members’ concerns about costs
2 October 2026
Trademarks
Lidl and P&G counsel: Greenwashing claims underpriced as litigation risks rise
28 September 2026

More articles

How we erased our rival’s pens from Amazon Marketplace
AIPPI World Congress: ‘Diversity need not be an obstacle to unity’
OPPO becomes first Chinese handset licensee on Via Qi patent pool
Birkenstock rulings expose Europe's 'functional' faultline
Jones Day adds senior partners in San Francisco and Amsterdam
‘I am Giorgia Meloni’: Can a trademark protect politicians from AI deepfakes?
Netlist and Micron settle patent dispute with $600m licence deal
Airbnb accused of trying to monopolise ‘BnB’ term in lawsuit

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin