25 October 2017Patents

IPRs are constitutional, US government claims

The US acting solicitor general has weighed in on a case being mulled over by the US Supreme Court over whether inter partes reviews (IPRs) are constitutional.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

SCOTUS Oil States decision may raise more challenges to IPR: lawyers

25 April 2018 The US Supreme Court yesterday confirmed that inter partes reviews do not violate the US Constitution, but lawyers have told WIPR that more challenges to the IPR should be expected.

Patents

US Supreme Court holds IPRs to be constitutional

24 April 2018 Inter partes reviews do not violate the US Constitution and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board has authority to invalidate patents.

Patents

The future of IPR: which way will SCOTUS rule?

27 November 2017 With the US Supreme Court today hearing a constitutional argument that could reshape the patent system by eliminating inter partes review, WIPR explains how we got here and which way the court might rule.

UK-India trade deal is ‘missed opportunity’, say industry bodies

SEPs now searchable on WIPO’s global patent database

INTA 2025: San Diego to host largest post-COVID Annual Meeting

'Nothing can stand in the way of our work': Ukraine resumes IP system

Foley adds five-partner team from Perkins Coie and K&L Gates

WATCH: Finding a new balance in IP protection with trade secret protection

Optis v Apple: How the court calculated the royalty rate

Cahill expands practice with three-partner team from King & Spalding

IPRs are constitutional, US government claims

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles