shutterstock_673982911_josefkubes
26 May 2021TrademarksAlex Baldwin

European marks dominate ‘best-protected brands’ list

The first-ever ‘ Top 100 Best Protected Global Brands’ report, released by Clarivate today, said that almost half of the best-protected brands across the world are based in Europe, representing 49 out of 100 of the countries featured.

To create the index, the IP data services company ranked approximately 80 million trademarks that remain in force on four factors: heritage and persistence, industry and market, footprint, distinctive identity.

The results were then evaluated for “digital presence” and “fame”.

Jeff Roy, president, IP Group, Clarivate, said: “Our very first ‘Best Protected Global Brands’ report honours businesses that have created powerful identities. Their brand stewards recognise the pivotal role IP plays in supporting business strategies and delivering long-term value.”

Business breakdown

According to the report, consumer brands made up just over half of the list, representing 51 of the 100 companies. Specifically, consumer goods and foods companies lead with 18 brands represented, followed by luxury/fashion/sports with 15 and then electronics with 13.

ABB, SKF and Caterpillar are among the non-consumer companies on the list, highlighting the importance of IP to industrial systems companies, said the report.

“We congratulate the ‘Top 100 Best Protected Global Brands’ for their commitment to elevating and protecting their commercial identity, at a time when the rate of change and complexity of competition is greater than ever before,” added Roy.

Conglomerate representation

Heritage brands made up a substantial part of the report, with 19 companies present that were first registered more than a century ago, including Coca-Cola, Nestlé, Kodak, Merck and Shell.

A total of seven companies appeared more than once on the list under different product brands, including Google (YouTube), ExxonMobil (Exxon, Esso, Mobil), and Nestlé (Nescafé, Maggi).

Roy concluded: “The traditional ways of protecting a product, brand or corporate identity are no longer adequate in today’s rapidly changing and geographically diverse environment. Understanding what works in this new landscape requires newly derived knowledge.”

The report measured company IP protection strength through the analysis of unified IP data, including trademark information, global case law and digital name protection.

The full report can be read here.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox

Today’s top stories

Netflix sinks copyright suit over ‘Outer Banks’ series

China: Secret solutions

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Trademarks
27 May 2022   When a company decides to discontinue a brand, it can return from the dead in a distorted form unless vigilant precautions are taken, says Anne Gilson LaLonde.
Trademarks
5 June 2020   What lessons can be learned from 3M’s determined campaign against the alleged price-gouging of its face masks? Angela He and Zachary Alinder of Sideman & Bancroft report.
Trademarks
23 May 2022   Ahead of his appearance at this week’s WIPR Trademarks Live, Appdetex CEO Rick Farnell has shared his thoughts on the IP implications of web3.