29 March 2021CopyrightRory O'Neill

‘Judges can’t play art critic’, warns 2nd Circ over Prince image

A US federal appeals court has ruled that Andy Warhol’s “Prince Series”, featuring modified images of the late pop star, infringed a photographer’s copyright and did not qualify as fair use.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Google v Oracle invalidates Prince judgment, says Warhol foundation

26 April 2021 The Andy Warhol Foundation wants a US federal court to revisit a decision finding that the late artist’s series of Prince images infringed a photographer’s copyright.

Andy Warhol Prince ruling ‘unsurprising’, say lawyers

3 July 2019 A ruling that a series of illustrations of late musician Prince by artist Andy Warhol are transformative and do not infringe a photographer’s copyright followed previous arguments made by the courts, said lawyers.

Trademarks

Prince estate steps up efforts to register purple TM

13 May 2019 The estate of the late singer Prince has filed a 430-page submission to the US Patent and Trademark Office outlining the musician’s association with the colour purple.

How to cook a frog: The erosion of exclusive copyright in the EU

‘Cynical and bewildering’: UK omits copyright protections in Data Bill

PierFerd taps experts in trade secrets and USPTO proceedings

‘Any copying was done by Getty lawyers’: Stability AI hits back

Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’

BSH v Electrolux: A US perspective on cross-border patent enforcement

Davis Wright Tremaine adds founding duo from Knobbe Martens

Getty slams Stability’s ‘distorted AI rubbish’ in opening arguments

‘Judges can’t play art critic’, warns 2nd Circ over Prince image

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles