3 July 2019Copyright

Andy Warhol Prince ruling ‘unsurprising’, say lawyers

A ruling that a series of illustrations of late musician Prince by artist Andy Warhol are transformative and do not infringe a photographer’s copyright followed previous arguments made by the courts, said lawyers.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

SCOTUS to examine fair use in Warhol ‘Prince Series’ case

29 March 2022 The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments on whether Andy Warhol’s “Prince Series” infringed a photographer's copyright, the outcome of which could change the law on ‘far use’.

Supreme Court asked to review Warhol ‘Prince’ judgment

10 December 2021 The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts has asked the US Supreme Court to review the Second Circuit’s ruling that the late artist’s “Prince Series” infringed a photographer’s copyright.

Second Circuit says Google v Oracle does not impact Prince judgment

25 August 2021 The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has refused to alter its ruling that Andy Warhol’s art series based on photos of the musician Prince infringed the original photographer’s copyright.

‘Once is good enough’: Getty closing arguments rely on scant evidence

Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman

Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far

Getty drops primary copyright claims against Stability AI

Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy

How IP firms can champion LGBTQ+ staff beyond Pride 2025

A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion

What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?

Andy Warhol Prince ruling ‘unsurprising’, say lawyers

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles