3 July 2019Copyright

Andy Warhol Prince ruling ‘unsurprising’, say lawyers

A ruling that a series of illustrations of late musician Prince by artist Andy Warhol are transformative and do not infringe a photographer’s copyright followed previous arguments made by the courts, said lawyers.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

SCOTUS to examine fair use in Warhol ‘Prince Series’ case

29 March 2022 The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments on whether Andy Warhol’s “Prince Series” infringed a photographer's copyright, the outcome of which could change the law on ‘far use’.

Supreme Court asked to review Warhol ‘Prince’ judgment

10 December 2021 The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts has asked the US Supreme Court to review the Second Circuit’s ruling that the late artist’s “Prince Series” infringed a photographer’s copyright.

Second Circuit says Google v Oracle does not impact Prince judgment

25 August 2021 The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has refused to alter its ruling that Andy Warhol’s art series based on photos of the musician Prince infringed the original photographer’s copyright.

What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?

Vidal: Settled expectations factor is ‘unconstitutional overreach’

‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out

A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion

Stamped out: What was in the US Copyright Office AI report?

Third Circ grants first ‘fair use’ AI and copyright appeal in Thomson v ROSS

Getty bid to broaden claim shut down by Court of Appeal

How to cook a frog: The erosion of exclusive copyright in the EU

Andy Warhol Prince ruling ‘unsurprising’, say lawyers

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles