• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • INTA 2024
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • SCOTUS to examine fair use in Warhol ‘Prince Series’ case
shutterstock_379065121_vicki_l_millerlarge
29 March 2022CopyrightAlex Baldwin

SCOTUS to examine fair use in Warhol ‘Prince Series’ case

The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments on whether Andy Warhol’s 'Prince Series' infringed a photographer's copyright, the outcome of which could change the law on ‘fair use’.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
Why patent eligibility is ripe for SCOTUS review
24 October 2022   A recent case has only added to the clamour for clarity on Section 101, says Phil Harris of Holland & Hart.
Copyright
US govt weighs in on ‘fair use’ rule in Warhol photo dispute
17 August 2022   Copyright case centres on controversial doctrine | The US government urged the Supreme court to back a ruling of infringement | But the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts claims work is ‘transformative’.
Patents
SCOTUS refuses to hear patent eligibility case
1 July 2022   Lawyers lament ‘missed opportunity’ after the US’ top court declines certiorari despite pressure from the Solicitor General.


Editor's picks

Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025
AI
UK delays AI bill at pivotal moment as High Court hears Getty case
9 June 2025
Artificial Intelligence
Getty v Stability AI: High stakes at the High Court
6 June 2025
Trademarks
AI, lipstick deals and mental health: What’s on CITMA president’s radar?
9 May 2025
Patents
Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history
2 May 2025
Patents
US-China tariffs: What hope is there for IP rightsholders?
1 May 2025

More articles

‘Cynical and bewildering’: UK omits copyright protections in Data Bill
PierFerd taps experts in trade secrets and USPTO proceedings
‘Any copying was done by Getty lawyers’: Stability AI hits back
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
BSH v Electrolux: A US perspective on cross-border patent enforcement
Davis Wright Tremaine adds founding duo from Knobbe Martens
Getty slams Stability’s ‘distorted AI rubbish’ in opening arguments
Getty v Stability AI: High stakes at the High Court

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin