In 1999, the idea of transforming the Amparo trial came up to safeguard governed citizens against acts of authority.
Derived from the need to have more laws that respond to the current demands and requirements of Mexico, in 1999 the idea of transforming the Amparo trial came up to safeguard governed citizens against acts of authority.
The main objective of an Amparo trial—brought to us by Manuel Cresencio Rejon and Mariano Otero in 1840 and currently established in our national legislation—is to restore circumstances to how they were before the violation of the authority.
In this sense, any governed citizen (individual and/or moral person) that files an Amparo trial, and who obtains a favourable decision, will alone be able to enjoy the reinstatement of its individual rights that were violated in the first place. This is what is known in law as a principle by the aggrieved party.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com
Amparo, Mexican Congress, IP
