Cadbury's sweet colour victory: a taste of things to come?
20-07-2022
Culinary retailer adapts TM after Nestlé complains
07-01-2020
Nestlé aims to crumble franchisee in trademark suit
10-10-2016
29-11-2021
Faizal Ramli / Shutterstock.com
It is hardly surprising that protracted litigation has arisen out of attempts by established household brands to register colours as trademarks, explain Alex Borthwick and Dominic Reilly of Powell Gilbert.
A colour trademark is a powerful right, given the instant impact that the colour of goods and their packaging has on consumers and the potential for restricting competitor choice in respect of a key aspect of product design. However, as with other non-conventional trademarks, meeting the criteria for validity can be a significant challenge and registered colour trademarks are comparatively rare.
One example on the UK register is Tiffany and Company’s mark for Tiffany Blue in class 14 of the Nice Classification, including jewellery, and precious and semi-precious stones (figure 1).
Figure 1: Tiffany Blue
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com
Nestlé, Cadbury, Powell Gilbert, litigation, colour trademarks, consumers, product design, protection, English Court of Appeal