• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • INTA 2024
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2024
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • KickassTorrents blocks proxy sites
1 July 2013Copyright

KickassTorrents blocks proxy sites

A banned online file-sharing site has blocked certain websites that allow users to circumvent a blocking order after a dispute over advertising.

KickassTorrents (KAT) has moved to block some of the servers, known as proxies, amid claims they had replaced Kickass’s advertising with their own and had switched adverts.

KAT, which was founded in 2008, allows users to share music and other files with each other online and is among the top 135 visited sites in the world.

In February this year it became one of several sites that Mr Justice Arnold ordered UK Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to cut off access to, after ruling it had infringed copyright.

However, it was able to combat the block via an intermediary, which allows users to gain the same access to the site and its services by going through a different address.

But the site has now moved to block users' access to some of the proxies, amid claims that they have replaced adverts, were performing too well in search engines and were not carrying enough of KAT’s own adverts.

Adam Rendle, associate at Taylor Wessing LLP, said the move demonstrated the importance of advertising revenue and search engine performance for the website.

He told WIPR: “It also illustrates why the content industry is focusing some of its anti-piracy efforts on challenging these aspects of the websites' business models.

Labelling the move “ironic”, given KAT’s business model, Rendle continued: “KAT appears to want to maintain traffic only if it arrives via routes which support its business model. Access via proxies will fall until the proxies agree to deliver traffic in the ways KAT wants.

“It is ironic that it so carefully guards its revenue streams when its business is based on depriving the creative industries of revenue.”

The lack of access also created a flurry of activity on Internet forums, with users confused about what was happening.

WIPR attempted to contact KAT through a contact address on its website but was told the email address was not in use.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
German file-sharing site owner pays the penalty
7 May 2013   The former operator of German file-sharing site torrent.to has been sentenced to three years and ten months in prison, in one of the harshest sentences for copyright infringement in the country to date.
Copyright
High Court orders ISP to block website
1 October 2011   A UK High Court Justice has ordered an ISP to block access to a file-sharing website that allows users to unlawfully access the copyrighted works of major films and television programmes.


Editor's picks

Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history
Patents
Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history
2 May 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history
2 May 2025
Trademarks
Thatchers, Skykick and dupes: What’s on a fashion IP influencer’s radar?
30 April 2025
Patents
Why US patent reform is ‘essential’ for US economic prosperity and security
28 April 2025
Patents
G1/23 ruling: Why a pending EPO decision threatens decade-old products
28 April 2025
Diversity
WIPR Diversity & Inclusion reveals Top 100 People in IP for 2025
23 April 2025
Trademarks
Resilience and the power of brands: Elisabeth Stewart Bradley on 9/11, inclusion and the INTA presidency
22 April 2025

More articles

UK-India trade deal is ‘missed opportunity’, say industry bodies
'Nothing can stand in the way of our work': Ukraine resumes IP system
US-China tariffs: What hope is there for IP rightsholders?
Thatchers, Skykick and dupes: What’s on a fashion IP influencer’s radar?
IP and the commercialisation of genomic tech in Nigeria
World IP Day: Can copyright stay in tune with AI-generated music?
Lenovo’s legal leader: We should be ‘enablers, not blockers’
Venable acquires accomplished IP trial lawyer for San Fran office

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin