• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • KickassTorrents blocks proxy sites
1 July 2013Copyright

KickassTorrents blocks proxy sites

A banned online file-sharing site has blocked certain websites that allow users to circumvent a blocking order after a dispute over advertising.

KickassTorrents (KAT) has moved to block some of the servers, known as proxies, amid claims they had replaced Kickass’s advertising with their own and had switched adverts.

KAT, which was founded in 2008, allows users to share music and other files with each other online and is among the top 135 visited sites in the world.

In February this year it became one of several sites that Mr Justice Arnold ordered UK Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to cut off access to, after ruling it had infringed copyright.

However, it was able to combat the block via an intermediary, which allows users to gain the same access to the site and its services by going through a different address.

But the site has now moved to block users' access to some of the proxies, amid claims that they have replaced adverts, were performing too well in search engines and were not carrying enough of KAT’s own adverts.

Adam Rendle, associate at Taylor Wessing LLP, said the move demonstrated the importance of advertising revenue and search engine performance for the website.

He told WIPR: “It also illustrates why the content industry is focusing some of its anti-piracy efforts on challenging these aspects of the websites' business models.

Labelling the move “ironic”, given KAT’s business model, Rendle continued: “KAT appears to want to maintain traffic only if it arrives via routes which support its business model. Access via proxies will fall until the proxies agree to deliver traffic in the ways KAT wants.

“It is ironic that it so carefully guards its revenue streams when its business is based on depriving the creative industries of revenue.”

The lack of access also created a flurry of activity on Internet forums, with users confused about what was happening.

WIPR attempted to contact KAT through a contact address on its website but was told the email address was not in use.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
German file-sharing site owner pays the penalty
7 May 2013   The former operator of German file-sharing site torrent.to has been sentenced to three years and ten months in prison, in one of the harshest sentences for copyright infringement in the country to date.
Copyright
High Court orders ISP to block website
1 October 2011   A UK High Court Justice has ordered an ISP to block access to a file-sharing website that allows users to unlawfully access the copyrighted works of major films and television programmes.


Editor's picks

US in-house counsel brace for funder-fuelled litigation in 2026
In-House
US in-house counsel brace for funder-fuelled litigation in 2026
16 January 2026

Editor's picks

In-House
US in-house counsel brace for funder-fuelled litigation in 2026
16 January 2026
Patents
What IPR and PGR institutions mean under USPTO director Squires
12 January 2026
Copyright
Top Gun: Maverick suit nosedives on copyright and contract claims
5 January 2026
Patents
PTAB year in review: A shifting landscape and outlook for 2026
2 January 2026
Patents
UPC: A review of 2025 and what to expect in 2026
30 December 2025
In-House
Three in-house counsel perspectives on 2025–2026: Part 2
24 December 2025

More articles

King & Spalding adds music-focussed duo in New York
US in-house counsel brace for funder-fuelled litigation in 2026
Final call: Who are the world’s best in-house counsel?
Top Gun: Maverick suit nosedives on copyright and contract claims
Betty Boop and early Disney characters enter US public domain
Trademark and brands expert returns to Womble Bond after spell in-house
Three in-house counsel perspectives on 2025–2026: Part 2
Three in-house counsel perspectives on 2025–2026: Part 1

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin