• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • KickassTorrents blocks proxy sites
1 July 2013Copyright

KickassTorrents blocks proxy sites

A banned online file-sharing site has blocked certain websites that allow users to circumvent a blocking order after a dispute over advertising.

KickassTorrents (KAT) has moved to block some of the servers, known as proxies, amid claims they had replaced Kickass’s advertising with their own and had switched adverts.

KAT, which was founded in 2008, allows users to share music and other files with each other online and is among the top 135 visited sites in the world.

In February this year it became one of several sites that Mr Justice Arnold ordered UK Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to cut off access to, after ruling it had infringed copyright.

However, it was able to combat the block via an intermediary, which allows users to gain the same access to the site and its services by going through a different address.

But the site has now moved to block users' access to some of the proxies, amid claims that they have replaced adverts, were performing too well in search engines and were not carrying enough of KAT’s own adverts.

Adam Rendle, associate at Taylor Wessing LLP, said the move demonstrated the importance of advertising revenue and search engine performance for the website.

He told WIPR: “It also illustrates why the content industry is focusing some of its anti-piracy efforts on challenging these aspects of the websites' business models.

Labelling the move “ironic”, given KAT’s business model, Rendle continued: “KAT appears to want to maintain traffic only if it arrives via routes which support its business model. Access via proxies will fall until the proxies agree to deliver traffic in the ways KAT wants.

“It is ironic that it so carefully guards its revenue streams when its business is based on depriving the creative industries of revenue.”

The lack of access also created a flurry of activity on Internet forums, with users confused about what was happening.

WIPR attempted to contact KAT through a contact address on its website but was told the email address was not in use.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
German file-sharing site owner pays the penalty
7 May 2013   The former operator of German file-sharing site torrent.to has been sentenced to three years and ten months in prison, in one of the harshest sentences for copyright infringement in the country to date.
Copyright
High Court orders ISP to block website
1 October 2011   A UK High Court Justice has ordered an ISP to block access to a file-sharing website that allows users to unlawfully access the copyrighted works of major films and television programmes.


Editor's picks

‘We created law’: G1/24 and the creation of the ‘diamond standard’
Patents
‘We created law’: G1/24 and the creation of the ‘diamond standard’
1 July 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
‘We created law’: G1/24 and the creation of the ‘diamond standard’
1 July 2025
AI
What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
20 June 2025
Future of IP
‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out
20 June 2025
Trademarks
Creative licence: Inside the LEGO Group’s Asia playbook
16 June 2025
Copyright
‘Cynical and bewildering’: UK omits copyright protections in Data Bill
13 June 2025
Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025

More articles

Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman
Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far
Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy
What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
Stamped out: What was in the US Copyright Office AI report?
Third Circ grants first ‘fair use’ AI and copyright appeal in Thomson v ROSS
Getty bid to broaden claim shut down by Court of Appeal
How to cook a frog: The erosion of exclusive copyright in the EU

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin