Harry and Meghan should ‘do the right thing’ and withdraw TMs
A UK law which likely requires the Queen’s consent to register ‘Sussex Royal’ as a trademark may leave Prince Harry and Meghan Markle with little choice but to drop the brand, lawyers have told WIPR.
The couple, who have decided to step back from royal duties, are in discussions with the Queen and the rest of the royal family on the precise nature of their future relationship.
Particularly at issue is the pair’s continued use of the term ‘Sussex Royal’, which the Queen reportedly considers “untenable” as they seek distance from active royal life.
Andy King, partner at Mewburn Ellis, said the Queen’s position means that the registrations, expected to be granted next month, could contravene UK trademark law.
WIPR reported yesterday, February 20, that section 4 of the UK Trade Marks Act 1994 requires the royal family’s consent for marks which could lead the public to think the application had royal authorisation.
If the Queen, as reported, considers the ‘Sussex Royal’ brand to be untenable, then this could potentially be seen as consent having been withdrawn, King said, clarifying that this would only apply once the couple formally step back from royal duties at the end of March.
“The registrations may be vulnerable to cancellation on this basis, although not necessarily,” he said. “The legal test is the position at the time that the applications were submitted, a time when the Sussex’s did have consent. It is for this same reason that the applications may not be opposable on this ground as things stand.”
While there have been multiple notices of threatened opposition against the ‘Sussex Royal’ marks, no formal oppositions have yet been filed.
But given the reported disagreement with the royal family, “if the registrations do indeed grant next month, it would seem necessary for the registrations to then be surrendered”, he added.
Harry and Meghan left with ‘no choice’
Laurie Heizler, of counsel at Barlow Robbins in London, said the Sussex Royal Foundation, which filed the marks and is owned by the couple, should “do the right thing and withdraw the applications”.
Given the Queen’s position, Heizler said it is “difficult to imagine that these trademark applications can now make any progress”.
Heizler argued that, in light of the Queen’s reported position, it would “certainly be in bad faith” if the couple’s company tried to progress the applications, despite having had royal authorisation when they were filed.
“Even if it did so, the well-publicised controversy surrounding the couple and the Queen’s interventions would most likely lead to the UK Intellectual Property Office refusing to grant the trademarks,” Heizler added.
“The company would be well advised to withdraw the trademarks—it probably has no choice,” he said.
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox.
Today's top stories:
Ohio jury hits Dentons with ‘record’ $32m legal malpractice verdict
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk