• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Date set for IP bill’s second Commons reading
29 November 2013Copyright

Date set for IP bill’s second Commons reading

The UK government has set a date for a second reading of its Intellectual Property Bill in the House of Commons, marking the first time it will be debated in the lower chamber of parliament.

According to a statement on the UK parliament’s website, the reading will take place on December 9.

The bill, which stems from recommendations outlined in the Hargreaves Review of Intellectual Property and Growth, an independent review of the UK’s IP strategy, was approved by the House of Lords, the upper chamber of the UK parliament, in July.

It was first presented to the House of Commons in August, although a first reading in that chamber is usually seen as a formality and takes place without debate.

The second reading, however, provides a first chance for members to debate its general purpose.

Provisions outlined in the bill include providing the power to implement the Unified Patent Court, if it is created, and introducing criminal sanctions for copying registered designs.

The design recommendations could see alleged copiers face a 10-year-prison sentence, unless they can prove that they “reasonably believed” they had not infringed an existing design.

However, the design provision has faced criticism by industry professionals, including the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys, which is worried about a potentially damaging effect on designers.

In October, WIPR reported that government minister David Willetts will be leading the bill through the House of Commons.

According to his government profile, Willetts, a minister for universities and science, is responsible for innovation.

The bill must pass three readings in the House of Commons before becoming law.

Any individual clauses and amendments will be made at the committee stage, which follows the second reading.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
UK parliament hears second reading of IP Bill
20 January 2014   The UK parliament has heard a second reading of the Intellectual Property Bill in the House of Commons, with the proposed criminalisation of infringing design rights a hot talking point.
Patents
Westminster Legal Policy Forum: Willetts to lead IP Bill through the Commons
24 October 2013   Government minister David Willetts is to lead the Intellectual Property Bill through the House of Commons, the UK’s IP minister has announced.
Copyright
IP bill announced in Queen’s Speech
9 May 2013   The Queen gave her yearly speech to parliament on May 8, where she announced a bill hoped to modernise the UK’s IP system.


Editor's picks

A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025
Future of IP
‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out
20 June 2025
Trademarks
Creative licence: Inside the LEGO Group’s Asia playbook
16 June 2025
Copyright
‘Cynical and bewildering’: UK omits copyright protections in Data Bill
13 June 2025
Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025
AI
Getty slams Stability’s ‘distorted AI rubbish’ in opening arguments
10 June 2025

More articles

‘Here to stay’: UKIPO unveils ‘interesting’ SkyKick roadmap
Champagne makers raise glass to key EU ruling on PDOs
Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman
How in-house patent pros are ‘enablers of innovation’
Life after Iconix v Dream Pairs: Key lessons for brand owners
Smart IP for startups: how to avoid the common traps
Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far
Dream Pairs 2—Iconix 1: A CoA rebuke

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin